What is the remedy when SC evades RULE OF LAW?
LAST RESORT..........LAST RESORT.......LAST RESORT
Writ Criminal against Supreme Court of India for Evading the Rule of Law; Violating set practice, procedure as laid down in the Handbook of this Hon'ble Court; protecting/shielding Bad Elements of State Apparatus and offending, harassing, victimizing the Petitioner-in Person and his Senior Citizen old age Oxygen dependent mother.
1. As a last resort under legal remedy before the COURT OF LAW, petitioner has filed another Writ Petition Criminal No. ………….of 2017 titled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS vide diary n0. 2188 with 5 applications viz. Application for argue in person; application for Special Power of Attorney on behalf of petitioner no.02 to argue; application for URGENT mentioning before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court; application for Constitution Bench and application for cancellation of N.B.W. dated 08.09.2011 process u/s 83 Cr.Pc. before Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India on 18.01.2017.
2. Petitioner has genuine apprehension in his mind that the same act will be repeated by the Registry of this Hon’ble Court to stop the petitioner from mentioning the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court because the matter contains material evidence against CJM & SDJM down the line at CJM division Begusarai, Bihar for an OFFENCE OF PERJURY. It also contains evidence against evasion of RULE OF LAW by the Judges from Trial Court to Supreme Court of India.
3. If this happens again this time and petitioner is being stopped by the Registry of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and consequently petitioner fails to mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s court then the door of the COURT OF LAW will be closed for ever for the petitioner no.01 and 02.
5.This happens to be last resort under legal remedy before the COURT OF LAW.
5. Therefore your VALUABLE INPUT is required to ensure that the petitioner could mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court this time.
FIND ATTACHED PETITION WITH CASE STATUS BEFORE SC. more
Writ Criminal against Supreme Court of India for Evading the Rule of Law; Violating set practice, procedure as laid down in the Handbook of this Hon'ble Court; protecting/shielding Bad Elements of State Apparatus and offending, harassing, victimizing the Petitioner-in Person and his Senior Citizen old age Oxygen dependent mother.
1. As a last resort under legal remedy before the COURT OF LAW, petitioner has filed another Writ Petition Criminal No. ………….of 2017 titled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS vide diary n0. 2188 with 5 applications viz. Application for argue in person; application for Special Power of Attorney on behalf of petitioner no.02 to argue; application for URGENT mentioning before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court; application for Constitution Bench and application for cancellation of N.B.W. dated 08.09.2011 process u/s 83 Cr.Pc. before Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India on 18.01.2017.
2. Petitioner has genuine apprehension in his mind that the same act will be repeated by the Registry of this Hon’ble Court to stop the petitioner from mentioning the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court because the matter contains material evidence against CJM & SDJM down the line at CJM division Begusarai, Bihar for an OFFENCE OF PERJURY. It also contains evidence against evasion of RULE OF LAW by the Judges from Trial Court to Supreme Court of India.
3. If this happens again this time and petitioner is being stopped by the Registry of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and consequently petitioner fails to mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s court then the door of the COURT OF LAW will be closed for ever for the petitioner no.01 and 02.
5.This happens to be last resort under legal remedy before the COURT OF LAW.
5. Therefore your VALUABLE INPUT is required to ensure that the petitioner could mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court this time.
FIND ATTACHED PETITION WITH CASE STATUS BEFORE SC. more
Viewed by 7
View all 6 comments Below 6 comments
If there is "S.C. Judgments where S.C. confined and highlighted the importance of an Advocate's petition" then Why SC allows Petitioner-in Person to file the petition. Why SC does not scrap the party-in person counter? If "This gives an opinion that the issue / Urge is not at its specifically significant cause that tenders preference under laws of protection from law or , provisions under article 32 , or , that identifies a questioning a law" then Why SC registered the case under Article 32 and heard twice in Writ criminal 136 of 2016 on 21.10.2016 and Review Criminal 825 of 2016 on 01.12.2016? Why SC diaries-ed the fourth petition this time on 18th January. Why Registry does not put up the matter before CJI? Whether or not it tenders preference under laws of protection from law or , provisions under article 32 ? Who will decide? Registry or Judge? So, in brief, reject the petition dump it in dustbin. Why keeping with Registry on hold? If it does not have importance? I think I have clarified your all doubts. I have no expectation of favor from SC. I have been fighting till date on merit. And I need a SPEAKING ORDER WITH REASONS TO ITS CONCLUSION from SC whether in favor or against me. more
Jan 24
This gives an opinion that the issue / Urge is not at its specifically significant cause that tenders preference under laws of protection from law or , provisions under article 32 , or , that identifies a questioning a law . Please think in this line as the case was disregarded for Hearing or considering as a case to be considered . If your cool mind finds a Cause/issue/question of a law or article , there will be achievement since there were S.C. Judgments where S.C. confined and highlighted the importance of an Advocate's petition as a PIL as you also said . A simultaneous attempt of Written and Registered post Letters to the Honourable President of India marking and sending the copy to CJI , SC of India directly will bring a justified support for hearing the Case . more
Jan 24
Sir, 10 petitions have sent to the Hon'ble President of India regarding this in 2016-17. Earlier in 2011-13 I have filed equally 10 petitions before Hon'ble President of India through Helpline. The normal procedure is that the President Secretarial forwards it to the Department of Justice and in turn Department of Justice forwards it to the Secretary General of Supreme Court of India and Secretary General of SC forwards it to the Grievance Management of Supreme Court of India under PIL. But nothing happens in Grievance Management under PIL of Supreme Court of India since years after years. I give you some examples of Grievance Management under PIL of Supreme Court of India. I have got the diary no.2206 dated 09.01.2016 and still pending under process. Like wise 43126 dated 08.10.2016;3179 dated 12.01.2017 and 3185 dated 17.01.2017 are still pending under process. Moreover, Grievance Management under PIL of Supreme Court of India disposes it after years of waiting "NO ACTION TAKEN SINCE CONTENTS OF COMPLAINT ARE NOT COVERED UNDER PIL GUIDELINES". Examples are dairy no.35529 dated 19.08.2016; 47003 dated 13.10.2016; 47004 dated 13.10.2016 and 50548 dated 21.10.2016 have been disposed of. As a result of that I have filed Writ Criminal before SC. sIR, in brief, there is absolute hegemony of black coat inside SC, eventually this hegemony prevails down the line across India. This petition is being filed to break this hegemony. There is sharp and loud message from the internal part of the Registry as well as from the Judges of SC that if you are an Advocate or an influential Advocate then you will be heard properly. more
Jan 23
Due to my eyes problem , I did not go through your annexures . As you also know better , since the issue of considering in the Court Registry is at doubt as expressed ; Since the issue is of NBW dated 8.9.2011 and its issue is long pending than the reasonable , say , beyond 5 years ; since this becomes the last resort , It is better to urge the Honourable President of India giving precise evidences and FACTS FOR NATURAL JUSTICE " victimizing the Petitioner-in Person and his Senior Citizen old age Oxygen dependent mother " with a request to consider the Case to be heard in the CJI Bench of Supreme Court . The President will consider the petition certainly since the URGE IS ONLY TO HERE THE CASE which is also guaranteed by the Constitution . Since the issue is also connected with the duty of Public Officers , and , as there were S.C. findings about the importance of such issues and cases to be preferred as if are at article 32 , there will be the justice anticipated by you please . more
Jan 23
Agreed with your long term remedy, "This requires a debate for a justified process system ". But what requires a debate, Sir? Sir, the same SC has expanded the Article 21 vigorously, just for the cause of withholding a Passport of Ms Menika Gandhi. Because she was influential and power elite. She filed petition through influential Advocates. Same SC dismisses Mr. Thakur (BCCI) within a minute and the same SC maintains delightful silence against a common man. Hence, "this attitude requires a debate". "Attitude of SC towards a petition filed by a common man & woman. Equality before Law." Sir, I am trying to draw your attention towards a deliberate attempt by SC to ignore "Textual meaning of RULE OF LAW; ignore Purpose and Objective of the particular Law"-- -matters related to In-Person or A common man or Woman. more
Jan 23
