VERDICT IN SC AGAINST TN GOVERNOR
The verdict passed by the SC on TN Governor case opens a pandora's box. The verdict appears to be partisan. May be legal counsels from Governor's side have not come up to mark in arguing the case properly.
- First of all it is not clear if the bills passed by the TN assembly is the voice of the people of the State. In this case, it is very clear that the majority party in the assembly has voiced its assent to the bills that may not necessarily reflect the voice of the people.
- what about the repugnancy?. It is very clear from the day bill came to Governor's assent that it is against the laid out norms that does not necessitate a change. The Court has not considered this issue at all.
- Governor post is a non-political arm of the Governance and he is appointed to guide that State in matters relating to its welfare. Agreed that there is a conflicting interest in the relation between the Centre and the State, but what about the merit of the case? Bills are being used as a tool to antagonize the Centre. How can one take it as a will of the people of the State. It is obvious that the State Government has not lost an opportunity to irritate the Centre on multiple issues. Does the Court not know this?.
There must be a appeal against this verdict and SC must decide the case purely on its merit without any bias. more
- First of all it is not clear if the bills passed by the TN assembly is the voice of the people of the State. In this case, it is very clear that the majority party in the assembly has voiced its assent to the bills that may not necessarily reflect the voice of the people.
- what about the repugnancy?. It is very clear from the day bill came to Governor's assent that it is against the laid out norms that does not necessitate a change. The Court has not considered this issue at all.
- Governor post is a non-political arm of the Governance and he is appointed to guide that State in matters relating to its welfare. Agreed that there is a conflicting interest in the relation between the Centre and the State, but what about the merit of the case? Bills are being used as a tool to antagonize the Centre. How can one take it as a will of the people of the State. It is obvious that the State Government has not lost an opportunity to irritate the Centre on multiple issues. Does the Court not know this?.
There must be a appeal against this verdict and SC must decide the case purely on its merit without any bias. more
Viewed by 91
View all 29 comments Below 29 comments
Dear Mr. Stephen, if there is some violation of any law, including Constitution, one can avail remedy as contemplated by law. more
Apr 16
Dear Mr. Dhandapani, it is not an issue of any body. Supreme Court simply passed order on a writ petition. Supreme Court simply discharged it's duty. Moreover SC is the apex Court. more
Apr 15
It is better to reduce the powers of the Governors as the past 75 years history shows they are more interested in working in partisan manner rather than acting as Constitutional functionary. more
Apr 15
But if SC interfere into the day to day administration of governor who is an bureaucratic whose ego is triggered even honest governor would not deliver justice so SC should not intervene in administration is my suggestions more
Apr 15
