Revert so Sh Pillai comment
Dear Sh. Pillai
referring to your advise that one should revert when the law is being made and not later when it is a law is a typical government approach (with all due respect)!
Does the law or it various branches seek the common man's views! I am myself at loss to understand what are the assumptions under which law is made and passed!
As a reference to support my argument take the divorce law which gives 50% right of husband property to the wife even when the wife has decided and does not want to take care of her old in laws - imagine the in laws if they were dependent upon the son ...they would be on the streets...so did the law before being passed by our esteemed people at both the houses even consider various situation and ask a panel of citizens - law is made as per few basis - I would like to debate this comment by your good-self on a common platform - I am not amazed at the response as I was expecting this would be the outcome. Why should a common man take the initiative to discuss what it has to undergo - what about the law, the government machinery ....what are they there for !
Lets not forget the entire country machinery has to function in a fair manner ..such law which has been recently passed was opposed by so many people ,,,as it is the women are leveraging this law and getting money ....should the men stop marrying...should they not buy property ...should they looking after their parent after they grow old...should the parents stop trusting their son ..Sir decision on law etc...has to be based on the existing scenario and not what has been happening decades back ..... more
referring to your advise that one should revert when the law is being made and not later when it is a law is a typical government approach (with all due respect)!
Does the law or it various branches seek the common man's views! I am myself at loss to understand what are the assumptions under which law is made and passed!
As a reference to support my argument take the divorce law which gives 50% right of husband property to the wife even when the wife has decided and does not want to take care of her old in laws - imagine the in laws if they were dependent upon the son ...they would be on the streets...so did the law before being passed by our esteemed people at both the houses even consider various situation and ask a panel of citizens - law is made as per few basis - I would like to debate this comment by your good-self on a common platform - I am not amazed at the response as I was expecting this would be the outcome. Why should a common man take the initiative to discuss what it has to undergo - what about the law, the government machinery ....what are they there for !
Lets not forget the entire country machinery has to function in a fair manner ..such law which has been recently passed was opposed by so many people ,,,as it is the women are leveraging this law and getting money ....should the men stop marrying...should they not buy property ...should they looking after their parent after they grow old...should the parents stop trusting their son ..Sir decision on law etc...has to be based on the existing scenario and not what has been happening decades back ..... more
Viewed by 14
View all 7 comments Below 7 comments
Issue is not about a long lengthy process which our government is good at- point from citizen aspect is where is the outcome more
Jun 10
Sirjee there is a saying ....when one experiences the flip side of something the approach changes including views ...I have several examples to quote and cases fought in supreme court for over 2 decades and when the person has gone old they still do not get justice .... more
Jun 10
again my point is did the government not anticipate this problem .... the last time I met a senior inspector I asked him if it were your parents and if you were from a good family background and they were all called to the police station just because the wives complained what would they do - tell their parents it is a law!! more
Jun 10
You have shared explained the entire process in a very exhaustive manner and I thank you for that. The point I was making was law made without understanding the impact is of no use - hence even before it is initiated as per the process the people who initiate it should understand the implications - in entirety it would be safe to say you rub my back and i rub your is the case in the country today .....coming back to the point can anyone sir explain to me why were so many laws in favor of women passed which the government is now realizing women are misusing it ... more
Jun 10
Sir 70% of Indian internet users who watch online videos. 59% of Indians who only access the internet via mobile devices. So it is safely assumed that the representation required to understand such key policies etc. is not read by a majority of Indians except some of us. It is a case of advertising your name change as a pure formality without expecting the concerned people if they have read the change! more
Jun 10
