Legal advice about "Letter Petitions" to the CJI/SC for enforcement of Fundamental Rights guarnteed by Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution under Article 32 (Grievance Management) before Supreme Court - Information and procedure for submission and action ?
Dear Circle Members,
Please inform about this Grievance Management system operational for registering of complaints before SC. I had filed a complaint regarding 'Concealment of vital facts' and 'Misleading the Court by submitting false and incorrect facts' ( A judgment delivered by CAT-Allahabad deciding 'Eligibility criteria and rejecting Common Seniority in violation of SRO 4/56 by Respondents'. This judgment attained finality as Respondents never assailed the judgment order before High Court/ SC for annulling the 'Ratio decidendi' ( TA 1444/1986, judgment delivered on 05/01/1987). Respondents had submitted under oath that petitioners belonged to 'Production classification' in Engineer cadre but but submitted under oath before Apex Court that petitioner belongs to 'Mechanical' thus committed 'Perjury' ( Contempt Petition No. 100/2009 in CA 4862/2007 arising out of SC judgment in SLP/CA 2322/91 decided by SC on 05/08/1993 dismissing Respondents' Appeal with costs contested in CAT-Calcutta (TA No. 1069/86) date of judgment 09-07-1990. Will some Advocate member provide me the required information and advice! Diary No. Of Complaint is 24110/SCI/PIL(E)/2018, present status is 'Under Process' since 21-05-2018. more
Please inform about this Grievance Management system operational for registering of complaints before SC. I had filed a complaint regarding 'Concealment of vital facts' and 'Misleading the Court by submitting false and incorrect facts' ( A judgment delivered by CAT-Allahabad deciding 'Eligibility criteria and rejecting Common Seniority in violation of SRO 4/56 by Respondents'. This judgment attained finality as Respondents never assailed the judgment order before High Court/ SC for annulling the 'Ratio decidendi' ( TA 1444/1986, judgment delivered on 05/01/1987). Respondents had submitted under oath that petitioners belonged to 'Production classification' in Engineer cadre but but submitted under oath before Apex Court that petitioner belongs to 'Mechanical' thus committed 'Perjury' ( Contempt Petition No. 100/2009 in CA 4862/2007 arising out of SC judgment in SLP/CA 2322/91 decided by SC on 05/08/1993 dismissing Respondents' Appeal with costs contested in CAT-Calcutta (TA No. 1069/86) date of judgment 09-07-1990. Will some Advocate member provide me the required information and advice! Diary No. Of Complaint is 24110/SCI/PIL(E)/2018, present status is 'Under Process' since 21-05-2018. more
Viewed by 37
Dear Shri Tripathi,kindly suggest name of competent advocate and his email address for consultation. Are you a practicing advocate? Thanks for your opinion. more
May 04
Please note that I am not disputing your averments. Only issue is, what is to be done in the matter. Courts entertain any matter, only when it is permissible under law. And your writ is not permissible under Article 32 of the Constitution. more
Apr 27
Dear Mr. Verma, Writ or PIL is not maintainable in the present case. You are moving in wrong direction. Please take help of an advocate. You can get something only when it is scrutinized by a legal expert. Rest assured, nothing is going to happen to your petition filed in SC. I have seen last order passed in Contempt petition of SC. You are wasting your time under false hope. Moreover it is not a PIL Matter. Supreme court will allot a diary number to every communication received by any mode. It does not mean that you petition has been entertained. It is almost two years when you sent your petition. So much time is not taken by SC in deciding whether a matter is PIL matter. A special official has been appointed by SC to consider PIL matter received through a letter. PIL is also a Writ petition under Article 32 in SC. Even if it is a PIL matter, it is not maintainable under Article 32. more
Apr 27
Dear Mr. Tripathi, My letter petition under Article 32 was addressed to Hon'ble CJI for protection of my fundamental rights(Art. 14, 19 & 21). Registry diaries it as 24110/SCI/PIL(E)/2018 on 21/05/2018. Respondents submitted false facts and concealed a judgment in TA 1444/86 delivered by CAT-Allahabad on 05/01/1987 thus decieved the Court to believe that they have implemented orders as per rules while defending contempt charges in Contempt petition No.100/2009 in CA 4862/2007, SLP 2322/91 in TA1069/86 decided by CAT-Calcutta on 09-07-1990 directing respondents to implement order withing 90 days. Respondents arbitrarily delayed implementation through repeated litigations by more than 27 years and partial implementation was in violation of statutory rules. more
Apr 27
Dear Mr. Verma, Grievances Management System in Supreme Court or any other court is looked after by administrative side of the court. Since the alleged perjury has committed during a judicial proceedings, therefore it is on judicial side and administrative side of the court will not intervene. The only option is to initiate contempt proceedings etc. on judicial side, by filing appropriate case in Supreme Court. Because if any perjury etc. has been committed in a judicial proceeding, it is the concerned court which can look into the matter. The opinion is subject to the documents of entire judicial proceedings. more
Apr 25
