I am giving the details of effect since it definitely has its implication to some extent in the subject of Women Safety that we are noting in other Posts . Ex. Ram, Nandan, Rao & Rajan . Ram Family Acres 30 -- Nandan Family Acres 30 FM, mS , mD 10 --------- FM , mS , mD 10 M Son 10 --------- m Married D -- M Son 10 --------- M Married D -- Total 5 30 --------- Total 5 10 Surrendered Acres Nil ---Surrendered Acres 20 Rajan Family Acres 30 Rao’s Family Acres 05 FM , mS , mD 10 ----------- FM , mS , mD 2 ½ M Son 10 ----------- M Son 2 ½ M un-Married ----------- M Daughter -- Daughter -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Total 5 -------20 ----------- Total 5-------- 5 Surrendered-- Acres 10 ----Surrendered -- Acres Nil This is Self Evaluating & Self Explanatory before 2005 From 2005 : Ram Family 1 x 6 = 6 + 4 x 6 = 24 = 30 Acres Nandan Family 1 x 2 = 2 + 4 x 2 = 08 = 10 Acres Rajan Family 1 x 4 = 4 + 4 x 4 = 16 = 20 Acres Rao’s Family 1 x 1 = 1 + 4 x 1 = 04 = 05 Acres 1. Implication of land Ceiling Act from 2005 whether exists if so, how . 2 i. Property rights of un married female – social implications ii. Property rights of Married female – family Circumstantial implications. 3. Disputes arise if male spouse possess property and the female spouse do not while his brother’s wife possess & brings in. 4. Clashes arising if female spouse possess property and her husband do not possess when her sister’s Husband possess and brings in . 5. The ambitious inspirations of Lovers on property at the event of Marriage where problem or cunning buds . 6. New Couple intending on Business or growth/ safeguard of Business naturally bends on property mortgage or Sale. 7. Male get only Parental property Share i.e., single Benefit . 8. Female get rights of Paternal property Share and also the enjoyment or Husband’s Property Share since the day of marriage or away from . 9. THE INDIAN CONCEPT OF FAMILY SYSTEM & SET UP APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN DISCONTINUED BY GOVT. WITH THE 2005 AMENDMENT . 10. Sri Rao’s committee Report appears to be fully not incorporated in 1948 and 1949 absolutely with pre planned will-full lead . more  

In my opinion , working out examples from two families referring A male and B Female ; the volume of properties definitely differ with A male and , the B a Widow or the one having no children . If this worked out with the implication of the land reforms holdings will give another situation of the volume of properties held. more  

good analysis and how many good children allow a widow to enjoy living in her home after security of husband is not there and vice versa, wife died and husband in his own house is made to feel like a stranger? more