It is subjective matter. Just like common belief is that if somebody wants to recover his money given to a person, he can not do so if he does not have any documentary evidence in support. more  

View all 9 comments Below 9 comments
That's great. I am very happy at the turn of events. Let the tribe of lawyers like Mr. S.B. Tripathi increase more and more. more  
Tripathiji, I am greatly obligated to you for offering to look into my cases to explore possibilities to get me justice and without charging any fee. Let me know where I can meet you in person and the convenient time in a given day. My email id is and can be reached on 9871217174. Thank you and God bless you. more  
Dear Mr. Ramakrishna, I find your cases peculiar and challenging for me. I would love to see your files, if you do not mind, and to find if anything can be done in the matter for you. My services will be free. more  
Thank you Tripathiji, Inherent flaws, as attributed by you, in my cases: A: In 138 case, (a) complaint details Accused no. 1 as the accused company but the memo did not list the company as accused. As my lawyer did not show any inclination to further the matter, I sought from the court to amend the memo in 2008 which the court disallowed (recently I learnt that Cr.P.C. provides for such an amendment at any stage of the case during the proceedings but before the final order is delivered. b) application by accused to dismiss the case as company is not made party was dismissed by the court in 2009 as not maintainable and unwarranted and accused did not go for any appeal to HC even when the same order gave them the liberty. c) MD of the company as an accused stated while answering charge in 2008 that (i) cheque was issued for liability to pay, (b) cheque got dishonored for insufficient funds, (c) notice of dishonor received and (d) payment not made despite the notice u/s 138. d) The case saw four judges changing during the four years and the last judge dismissed the complaint on his very second sitting on the case stating a SC order that says Directors can not be prosecuted u/s 138 when company is not made an accused ...??? HERE s. 138 clearly states that any one or all of the persons can be prosecuted and also goes on to explain what 'company' means, which is a body formed by directors. NOWHERE DOES THE s. 138 OR NI ACT FOR THAT MATTER SAYS THAT DIRECTORS CAN NOT BE PROSECUTED IF COMPANY IS NOT MADE AN ACCUSED. UNDER WHAT LAW SC SAYS DIRECTORS CAN NOT BE PROSECUTED u/s 138 WHEN COMPANY IS NOT MADE A PARTY EVEN WHEN THE SECTION STATES CLEARLY THAT ANYONE OR ALL CAN BE PROSECUTED? IS IT NOT A PUNISHMENT ON VICTIM OF UNSCRUPULOUS PERSONS DRAWING CHEQUES AND UNDER LAW THAT DOES NOT EXIST? B) The consumer court matter was against a bank, insurance co. (group co. of the bank) and their DSA. a) DSA (ex-parte) collected 9.54 lacs instead of 8.81 lacs and did not refund the excess amount which the CF did not feel as defficiency or negligence, b) bank insisted on insuring loan against risk of inability to pay and got the premium collected but mocked a process of police through its group insurance company which does not have any such product to cover the risk of inability to pay whereas its another group company had the specific insurance which the bank deliberately evaded. AND CF, ST. COM., N. COM. opined that banks can seek any condition. c) insurance co. filed photocopy of an alleged application which was meant for a loan co-applicant when in fact loan did not have any loan co-applicant which were strongly objected to by complainant as fake, fabricated and forged and that no such co-applicant exists AND CF, ST. COM., N. COMM. ruled that the alleged application form bears signature although claimed by complainant as forged and because of the signature present the insurance co. or bank are not deficient, negligent or employed restrictive trade practices. d) CF took 2 years to dismiss complaint, St.COM AND N. COM REJECTED APPEALS WITHOUT EVEN ADMITTING. So, these, if are the inherent flaws in the cases, then the judiciary is a great body to practice illegality by ignoring provisions of law and favoring influential entities and persons to punish victim for sin not committed and under law that does not exist. more  
So sorry Mr. Ramakrishna. It appears that there is some inherrent flaw in your cases or there has been mishandling of your cases. Never blame the judiciary. How case is handled is also crucial. more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • Aadhar Card

      I shifted my house from one area to another in same city. i.e from sector 53 to Sect 42 in Gurgaon . I am unable to change new address on aadhar card as Govt wants me to produce address proof. To ...

      By Rajeev Bhargava
    • Can a Co-owner as wife make a Trust deed ?

      Sale deed has 2 names-Husband & Wife. Husband is living separately in another home and wife was earning to buy flat,( Husband had No source of income) Wife is paying for maintainance...

      By Anonymous Circle member
    • Refund rule against downgrading to 3ed A.C from 2nd A. C.

      For travel on 2th April 2022 from Thane to Bydur ( Mookambika Road), on konkan Railway.the ticket booked on line through IRCTC. For difference fare, ZTTE issued a certificate. PNR no.8449078066.

    • MB loan customer care number ❾❶⓿❷❶❷❹❺❸❽

      MB loan customer care number ❾❶⓿❷❶❷❹❺❸❽ MB loan customer care number ❾❶⓿❷❶❷❹❺❸❽ MB loan customer care number ❾❶⓿❷❶❷❹❺❸❽

      By Bookmy Kumar
    • OB cash loan customer care number 9102124538

      OB cash loan customer care number 9102124538 🇮🇳 OB cash loan customer care number 9102124538 🇮🇳

      By Raju Kumar
    • ancestral property rights

      Dear Members We are 4 kids to our parents, after parents expired without partition or will. Now I want to give up all my ancestral property rights to some one legally, so that they can c...

      By Anonymous Circle member
    • CITY Governance Charges (CGC) on Carpet Area Basis?

      In a mega township project where one of the reputed builder charging CITY Governance Charges (CGC) based on per sq ft basis. It's nothing to do with building common area maintenance charges which i...

      By Mahesh Bhutkar
    • H'ble SC asked GOI;- Is Govt willing to Ban Convicted Netas life long to Contest Elections

      A CJI Teared His Eyes. A CJI suggested Joint Meets of Judiciary and Executive. Another CJI deeply regretted and Seriously commented on Convicts Heading a Political Party and Share the Rule. T...

      By Csn Sarma
    • Harazent by neighbor and society community

      What should we do to when a neighbor keeps harassing to us and our tenants who stay in our house which is in ozone villa society pune. When I was staying in 2014 with my six months baby and trying ...

      By Anjana P K Jain

      Legal Agreements are a part of our every day life. We get into formal Agreements at various stages of our life. Parents sign on Agreements for their wards at school since minors cannot get into con...

    • RWA Maintenance

      Hi, Would like to know is there are any court order or Law which gives flexibility for Owner/Tenant to pay the maintenance amount as per his/her convenience. Initially the m...

      By Anonymous Circle member
Enter your email and mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

All My Circles
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)