Need of ' National Council for Constitutional Governance '

A.P. High Court warned Bureaucrats that they will face imprisonment. Contempt of Court Cases in Joint A.P. High Court As at: 2013-2,343 ; 2014- 2,289 ; 2015- 2,534 ; 2016- 2,651 ; 2017- 2,851 ; 2018 at 31/10- 2,795. This absolutely show the oppressive and suppressive monopoly of Politically Elected Authorities. More or less, I think, SAME SUCH SITUATION IN ALL STATES. Judiciary's Orders and Directions since 1963 had been set aside by Executive and even Legislating Houses while from 70s, Courts cornered with insufficient No. of Courts and, inadequate No. of Judges which resulted in pending cases in lakhs. It is no exception, even as on date, the Pending Bills in India's Parliament Houses is above 60 in number which challenges the public and national interest. National Political Party, Congress, diluted CEC in 70s ; denied CEC proposed regulations of Political Parties, Contestants etc., in 2013 ; preferred to call back CJI who commented on the pitiable fate of Indian Democracy when those Convicted also permitted to lead a Political Party , appoint his Proxy as Chief Minister - in this year, the 2018 . ADDED TO SUCH ILL-FULL AND EVIL POLITICISM, the Congress Party, the mother Party of Political Parties of the Country, occupied Ruling Status sharing a minority scored party GIFTING THE SEAT OF Chief Minister. We all know that necessary mandatory REFORMS are required in many Fields for which we have joined, keeping and working together in these localcircles.com BUT, IS ALSO DEPENDENT ONLY ON MAJORITY SEATS IN PARLIAMENT HOUSES AS WELL AS , atleast 60% of States to conclude the Constitutional Amendments forever. This pitiable and pathetic situation is thus became inevitable JUST BECAUSE THE SUPREME COURT ALSO WAS NOT AUTHORIZED AS THE SUPREME FOR RESPONSIBLE CARRY OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULE . This is why, Supreme Court alone shall inspire, step up at national and public interest , re visiting their earlier Judgments like AIR 1983 SC 624 where they confined that S.C. is responsible for implementation of Constitutional Provisions ; AIR 1992 SC 1858 on Preamble Guarantees ; [1996] 4 SCC 212 cautioned that State if neglects ; [1994] 1 SCC 243 where S.C. ordered that Every Limb of Constitutional Machinery to be people oriented etc., etc., TO ORDER, IMPLEMENT AND ENFORCE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE to preserve the Honour, Reputation, and, Supremacy of Houses of Peoples and the very Democracy of India mandating their responsibility on the vested Right of Making Rules and Responsibility of People's needs leaving off the duty-bound responsibility of enforcing Constitutionally mandated Governance. more  

Even UNO and G-20 Countries called for curb of Corrupt practices in Trade and Business Sector which demand Commercial Courts . more  

At National interest, we have to consider this issue also which is most important and questioning reality of inadequacy of Funds more  

Governance as mandated by Constitution has been ignored, neglected and set aside depriving very Life Article 21. Part IV , Article 36 did not mandate silence of Union Government on any article from 36 to 51 A. Directive Principles of Rule are fundamental under article 37 in Governance of the Country and is the duty of the State and States to enforce. Article 38 mandates Justice, social economic and Political to inform all institutions of National Life. Article 39 read with 38 mandates to minimise economic inequalities ; and that operation or economic system shall not result in concentration of wealth, means and resources ; and that the provisions and opportunities of Justice for security and production are not denied to any Citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. Preamble of our Constitution stipulated that Directive Principles of State Policy are fundamental to enforce the right to Live Article. Supreme Court many times reiterated and confined that Part III and Part IV are equally fundamental and supplementary to each other. BUT, THE RULE UNDER POLITICAL AUTHORITY HAD AT ITS SELFISH POLITICAL INTERESTS, diversified, diluted and thus cornered their very Citizen and deteriorated overall Growth of the Country and hence THERE IS ABSOLUTE NEED TO FORM A SPECIAL AND SPECIFIC COUNCIL TO CARRY THE CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED SYSTEM OF RULE that was contemplated in the Constitution please . more  

The earlier CJI also preferred joint meetings between Judiciary and Executive after conclusion of Bangalore Meeting of PM, CJI and others. As had been proved, No individual Body of the Constitution could really carry the Constitutional mandates and Provisions to its Citizen. [ Many Judgment Orders of S.C. since 1963 had been set aside by the Rulers of this Country while purposefully kept Judiciary insufficient and inadequate in number of Courts and Judges since 1985 ] Corruption going increasing and threatening GOI controlling introductions and this lead in one way raids on Black Money and in the other way resulted in outburst in RBI, CBI, too. Constitutional mandates of Education and Adequate Means of Livelihood which are the roots of Life Article 21 also had been set aside and lead the depended citizen still strive and starve under Independent Rule. We and the Country have witnessed the deep concerns of Prime Minister, President of India and, the Chief Judges of Supreme Court during 2015, '6, 17, and, this the 2018. This itself prove, tender and mandate such a Joint Body to bring in one line, the individual Constitutional Bodies AND THIS IS ONLY REMEDY to have good governance under the diplomacy set in concluding the Constitution. more