Judiciary - Law and Justice
1. The policy of Justice delivery, ‘ Justice, Morality, Humanity and Goodness as well as binding on Constitutional Base Structure and Concept, had been diversified without applying these principles.Even Preamble Guarantees of the Constitution also had been set aside while concluding many Judgments.
2. Supreme Court Judgments on Reservations in 1963, Speedy Trial in 1979 , Judgment of 1983 saying S.C. is responsible to Constitutional Provisions , Judgment of 1983 directing that No State to ignore Cases of Poor, S.C. Order of ’85 that accrued cases take 15 more yrs from '85, Judgment on Free Legal Aid in 1987, SC direction in 1992 on the binding of Preamble Guarantees, S.C. direction in 1995 for working out implementation of UNIFORM CIVIL CODE , Judgment of 1996 on penalties if State Neglects, S.C.Judgment of 1984, ‘85 and ‘94 on the Functional responsibility of Press and Media , AND SEVERAL OTHER ORDERS IN THE ISSUES OF Educational Institutions, Education, of 1993, Judgment of 1994 directing that Every Limb of Constitutional machinery to be people Oriented, above all , on the coverage responsibility of Article 32 ; ALL ARE STILL AWAITING JUSTICE AND JUSTIFIED IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES AND, THE SO CALLED IPC in real terms and bindings .
3. Individuals having Criminal Candidature are decades together permitted to Rule in the Country questioning the Sanctity of Justified Rule under the adopted Constitution. What the Constituent Assembly considered while adopting is certainly not to allow Criminals to share the Rule in the Indian Constitution . How can this be a Right under Article 19 or 21 or Preamble Guarantee is to be still Justified .
Lakhs of Crores of Public and Government Funds and Finances had been allowed for Misuse and Misappropriation decades together while National Income, Revenue, Wealth,Natural Resources had also been under Misuse and Misappropriation . What is the Sanctity of Article 19 , 38, 39 , Preamble Guarantee and IPC is still to be Justified .
4. Constitutional Mandates ,National Interest and National Integrity are getting challenged and the Delayed Justice creating Social and National Unrest and Torture to Police and Governments while instigating many to agitate . Thus creating insecurity to the general public. Minimum issues need to be specifically Regulated to eradicate such practices even in future. Judiciary to think on this still under Security guarantees of the Constitution .
5. Some times Judges follow the version of Indian Law Commission that Female possess special qualities of inability and disability applying discriminating strategies and some times uphold the Equality concept of Fundamental Rights . The issue of Equality in Equal Status and Classes and the General Equality for Constitutional Provisions of Part III and IV are same . But,Applying this Equality Clause on issues where Female gender qualities of inability and disability, scientific/biological issues play a vital Role in Physical and mental Performance is naturally different and is an unjustified Factor.Who takes responsibility of Female Safety and Security if the general qualities of Female play a Role leading to disaster to their Life is the fundamental issue to be concluded .
6. THUS, THERE IS MUCH FOR THE INDIAN LAW COMMISSION, BAR COUNCIL AND JUDICIARY TO REFORM AND REGULATE IN TERMS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL DIRECTIVES EVEN NOW Please . more
2. Supreme Court Judgments on Reservations in 1963, Speedy Trial in 1979 , Judgment of 1983 saying S.C. is responsible to Constitutional Provisions , Judgment of 1983 directing that No State to ignore Cases of Poor, S.C. Order of ’85 that accrued cases take 15 more yrs from '85, Judgment on Free Legal Aid in 1987, SC direction in 1992 on the binding of Preamble Guarantees, S.C. direction in 1995 for working out implementation of UNIFORM CIVIL CODE , Judgment of 1996 on penalties if State Neglects, S.C.Judgment of 1984, ‘85 and ‘94 on the Functional responsibility of Press and Media , AND SEVERAL OTHER ORDERS IN THE ISSUES OF Educational Institutions, Education, of 1993, Judgment of 1994 directing that Every Limb of Constitutional machinery to be people Oriented, above all , on the coverage responsibility of Article 32 ; ALL ARE STILL AWAITING JUSTICE AND JUSTIFIED IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES AND, THE SO CALLED IPC in real terms and bindings .
3. Individuals having Criminal Candidature are decades together permitted to Rule in the Country questioning the Sanctity of Justified Rule under the adopted Constitution. What the Constituent Assembly considered while adopting is certainly not to allow Criminals to share the Rule in the Indian Constitution . How can this be a Right under Article 19 or 21 or Preamble Guarantee is to be still Justified .
Lakhs of Crores of Public and Government Funds and Finances had been allowed for Misuse and Misappropriation decades together while National Income, Revenue, Wealth,Natural Resources had also been under Misuse and Misappropriation . What is the Sanctity of Article 19 , 38, 39 , Preamble Guarantee and IPC is still to be Justified .
4. Constitutional Mandates ,National Interest and National Integrity are getting challenged and the Delayed Justice creating Social and National Unrest and Torture to Police and Governments while instigating many to agitate . Thus creating insecurity to the general public. Minimum issues need to be specifically Regulated to eradicate such practices even in future. Judiciary to think on this still under Security guarantees of the Constitution .
5. Some times Judges follow the version of Indian Law Commission that Female possess special qualities of inability and disability applying discriminating strategies and some times uphold the Equality concept of Fundamental Rights . The issue of Equality in Equal Status and Classes and the General Equality for Constitutional Provisions of Part III and IV are same . But,Applying this Equality Clause on issues where Female gender qualities of inability and disability, scientific/biological issues play a vital Role in Physical and mental Performance is naturally different and is an unjustified Factor.Who takes responsibility of Female Safety and Security if the general qualities of Female play a Role leading to disaster to their Life is the fundamental issue to be concluded .
6. THUS, THERE IS MUCH FOR THE INDIAN LAW COMMISSION, BAR COUNCIL AND JUDICIARY TO REFORM AND REGULATE IN TERMS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL DIRECTIVES EVEN NOW Please . more
Viewed by 46
While provocators sided, Stakeholders Conceal, Supporting Critics targeting PM, HM . What a Civic Responsibility ? Judiciary only to Judge more
Mar 04
Judiciary was set insufficient, inadequate. SC Order AIR 1979 SC 1369 ; [1087] 4 SCC 609 prove Collusive Plot of Congress. IPC set aside on Prime issues OF PUBLIC TRANQUILITY ; CONTEMPT OF LAWFUL AUTHORITY ; PUBLIC SAFETY ; OFFENCES CREATING RELIGIOUS CLASHES ; AND ELECTIONS . Policingg was cornered failing Law and Order. Lawyers still to abide by the Oath of Sworn Promise while the execution of Judicial Orders so harassing the Parties involved. ( SEE THE DEATH EXECUTION OF NIRBHAYA CONVICTS OF RAPE ) . This is leading the issue of Justice in ambiguity while several types of Crimes increasingly multiplied thus questioning the whole purpose and sanctity of Constitutional Guarantees . LAWS MUST BE CHANGED TO PLACE JUSTICE ATOP OF ALL INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS WHEN OFFENSES PROVED IN A BENCH OF H.C./S.C/ APPEAL more
Mar 02
