Indian Judiciary- As an Institution "serving the common-man"
IS INDIAN JUDICIARY. PRESENT GOVERNMENT INCLUDING HON NARENDRA MODI IS IN A POSITION TO SOLVE THE RIDDLE TARIK-PE Tarik.. MAAN KI BAAT TO SPEAK UP. more
Viewed by 37
if u keep crying then future generations will also have to keep crying. the mess is due to ineffective judiciary. our judiciary allows absolute authority and impeccable immunity without any explicit accountability on to judges/advocates which is being exploited to make earning out of grievances by advocates. the merits of the case have lost priorities and other manipulation have bcom important. Judicial reforms fastening responsibility of advocates/judges to strictly adhere to rule of law otherwise punishable for aiding injustice is the need of hour. i have prepared rough petition " Indian Judiciary kills" which ull find under petition. If u fine it proper then u and ur friends may please sign it and we will pursue the matter to logical ends. more
Sep 17
1. Judiciary as an institution set for dilution a decade back to their Directive Judgment ref: {1987} 4 SCC 609 where they disclosed that Pending Cases of previous 10-15 yrs. takes 15 years to complete. This institution was set with insufficient no. of Courts and inadequate no. of Judges too. 2. " Serving the Common-man " was the motto of Judiciary ref: AIR 1979 SC 1369 declared its goal ' Speedy Trial ' ;; AIR 1983 SC 339 confined that no State to ignore cases of Poor ;; {1994} 1 SCC 243 mandated that Every Limb of Constitutional Machinery to be People Oriented ;; AIR 1983 SC 624 concluded that S.C. is Responsible to Constitutional Provisions ; AIR 1963 SC 649 ordered for justified method of deletion revising 5 early ;; in service of common men . These 5 confirmatory Verdicts of Judiciary in 1963,79, 83 and 1994 prove the role of Judiciary - As an institution - " Serving the Common men " 3. Judiciary, Government, including honourable P.M. Narendra Modi THOUGH CAN RE ENERGIZE, EMPOWER THE ISSUE OF " Serving the Common-man " , it takes at least same number of Decades [ 1975 to 2014 = 4 - 1 = 3 ] i.e., 3 Decades to set right the dilution of Judiciary and diversification in SERVING THE COMMON-MAN [ In terms of Constitutional Mandates that were neglected ] . 4. BUT, EVEN THEN, JUDICIARY AS AN INSTITUTION, GOVERNMENT, P.M. NARENDRA MODI CANNOT SOLVE/ARREST THE ' RIDDLES ' AND LOOP-HOLES OF THE LAWS OF RULE and the Rule of Law unless the System of concluding Justice is mandated :::::::::: 1. Order of Verdict to specify Terms concluded in awarding Justice [ Purpose and Objective of the Law/Section ; Practice and Convention in General ; the Text of the Section. 2. Order of Verdict in all Cases of Appeals to specify punishment for Misrepresentation of Facts/Fake Certifications/Created Evidences/False Fabrications and False Witnesses and Lies . This, in my opinion can be mandated and achieved ONLY WHEN PARLIAMENT, EXECUTIVE AND, JUDICIARY ADDED WITH THE SUPPORT OF PRINT AND ELECTRONIC MEDIA Severally and Jointly conclude . It is because, Justice and Service to Common Men cannot be so Justified in the absence strict and stringent follow of the acute method of concluding Justice on any issue since a law can be advocated, argued severally . THIS FAILS THE PURPOSE OF JUDICIARY AND JUSTICE . more
Sep 10
:): I am conducting a case in Gurgaon Court. The judge never sits there and for the last 5 dates, I am a helpless lawyer: listening to the taunts of my client and suffering the traffic to Gurgaon. :): In Delhi, we are in control of situation and a heavy cost is imposed on the defaulting party. :) more
Sep 07
