Gist of Consumer Protection Bill.......

Excerpt from TOI Top Ten news: for general information......

The Consumer Protection Bill, 2019 that seeks to strengthen the rights of consumers was passed by Parliament on Tuesday. It will replace the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Who's a consumer? The law brings into its fold, new modes of selling (like e-commerce, tele-shopping, direct selling etc) and will apply to all goods and services, including sale or construction of houses. It also defines unfair contracts, enlarging the scope of unfair trade practices mentioned in the earlier law.

Easier to complain: It allows consumers to file complaints with consumer commissions at the place of their residence or work and not necessarily from where the item was purchased, or the service availed. Consumer affairs ministry will also frame rules for filing complaints electronically and paying the required fee digitally. Consumers will also be allowed to seek a hearing through video conferencing. A commission cannot reject a complaint without hearing it (within 21 days of filing it). The law also has a provision for dispute settlement through mediation.

Their liability, your right: The new law makes it mandatory for manufacturers, sellers or service providers to compensate consumers for defects or deficiency in products or services. Sharing of personal information of consumers is recognised as an unfair trade practice under the new law, which also proposes strict action against advertisers for misleading ads.
A new regulator: A national level regulatory authority known as the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) will have powers to initiate class action and enforce recall, refund or return of products unlike the existing consumer protection councils which are only advisory bodies.

The confusion: The government removed healthcare as one of the services to make the bill 'non-controversial'. While the CCPA will be a central regulator for consumer issues, there are other regulators for various sectors (like telecom, insurance), which leaves the scope for overlapping jurisdictions and confusion. While the law proposes a 21-day deadline for hearing complaints, the posts of president of consumer commissions are lying vacant in 118 of the 596 districts and as many as 362 posts of commission members are lying vacant. Similarly, the bill does not mention what qualifications are needed to be a member of the redressal body. This may lead to conflicts of interest if a current or former government employee ends up hearing a case involving the government, for instance. Some activists have also said that the multiplicity of options to complain — consumer courts, councils, sector regulators — will also end up confusing consumers. more  

View all 11 comments Below 11 comments
Unfortunately, there is too much of delay in the proceedings to resolve a complaint.Most of the manufacturers/dealers/service providers do not takt the consumer courts seriously. more  
A revised & consumer friendly law in place of the decades old law was the need of the hour to protect the interests of the consumers in the changed scenerio. more  
My comments on this subject, as uploaded in the TOI, are reproduced here:

'This exercise is nothing but am eye wash. I have been writing to several fora for the last 20 years that, every seller/producer of all products must be required to clearly mention in their respective webpages their email contact addresses so as to enable the dissatisfied/aggrieved consumers to at least reach the entity responsible for the production and sale of a defective product. For the last about 8 months, for example, I have been trying to reach the manufacturer of a nebulizer, marketed by Apollo Hospitals group. The email address of the concerned person given in the papers/website is clearly fake as my mails have invariably bounced back. My attempts at reaching Apollo through Messenger also yielded no response, while the Apollo outlet is merrily sitting right. All this because of the permissive latitude allowed to the big parties in the economy for obvious reasons. What is suggestive, however, is that the Apollo group had had statutory interaction with me during my very long stint in Chennai.' more  
Instead of framing a new Bill, the compensation and cost should have been made 10 times more. Then only the consumers will get empowered. The present amounts awarded are chickenfjoeed and does no justice to the consumer ; even the cost of transport in attending to 30 to 40 hearings is not recovered. more  
Every one should note that what has come to us is a mere copy of he bill which is passed by both the houses. It will become an act when published in the Gazette and will be applicable then. The Govt. have also to frame rules and Regulations to be framed by the Central Commissioner. When all this will come in our hand then only it will be appropriate to analyse in details more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • Inflated MRPs - Cost to MRP ratio of 1000+pct

      Everyone see this attached video. Medical product manufacturers mark MRP of 1000+% from the cost price. We need Govt to bring a simple law. Trade Margin cannot be above 200% i.e. syringe...

      By Sudesh Rai
    • Plain printed packet without mandatory declarations

      In this diwali festival, I wanted makhana and reached out to a local grocery store, who is quite famous and offers almost all brands. I asked for makhana and he handed me over a 100 GM, pre-packed ...

      By Ashish Jain
    • Why do sites like H&M dont show MRP

      Recently we liked some shoes on H&M site. Was surprised to see they had no MRP. Why do these foreign companies not comply to laws of the land. If nike and adidas shoes have MRP, H&M shoes a...

      By Swati M
    • Outright violation by Club factory

      Downloaded this app called Club factory from Indian apple store. It shows No MRP. It shows comparison to flipkart. Its selling 1600 product for 99. I am not sure if it will ever come. A...

      By Anshu Saxena
    • Legal Metrology should visit Brand Factory

      Legal Metrology officials must visit this company Brand Factory and book these people for Unfair Trade Practice of charging GST above discounted MRP and misleading advertisements. See th...

      By Amod Agarwal
    • Fraud sellers at AMAZON

      Yes this is true all sellers have formed a cartel. I was looking for PHILLIPS ears and nose trimmer. the M.R.P. was quoted at 7000 and discounted to 2000.but if you visit the official website of Ph...

    • Major IKEA - Amazon fraud going ON

      I urge Consumer Affairs Legal Metrology people to look into this gaming that is going on between Ikea, independent sellers and Amazon. See attached Ikea products with an MRP are being li...

      By Nikita Mehra
    • BE very careful of PayTM

      Look at MRPs. Iphones are listed at much higher mrps on paytm than apple’s own site. Everyone think twice thrice before spending any money on this paytm.

      By Nirmala Chauhan
    • Brand Factory is a cheater company

      3699 mrp product advertised with 50 pct off. Customer expects price of 1850. They bill 1950. Add gst after price. Controllers of metrology - do u permit this?? Why? See attach...

      By Neena Biswas
    • Big basket selling above MRP

      Now will legal metrology book its board members or directors!

      By Shikha Jain
    • ITC doing unfair trade practice via W stores

      Charging gst above discounted MRP. Not how it should be. See attached.

      By Sandhya Agarwal
Share To
Enter your email & mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

Please select a Circle that you want people to invite to.
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)