Gist of Consumer Protection Bill.......

Excerpt from TOI Top Ten news: for general information......

The Consumer Protection Bill, 2019 that seeks to strengthen the rights of consumers was passed by Parliament on Tuesday. It will replace the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Who's a consumer? The law brings into its fold, new modes of selling (like e-commerce, tele-shopping, direct selling etc) and will apply to all goods and services, including sale or construction of houses. It also defines unfair contracts, enlarging the scope of unfair trade practices mentioned in the earlier law.

Easier to complain: It allows consumers to file complaints with consumer commissions at the place of their residence or work and not necessarily from where the item was purchased, or the service availed. Consumer affairs ministry will also frame rules for filing complaints electronically and paying the required fee digitally. Consumers will also be allowed to seek a hearing through video conferencing. A commission cannot reject a complaint without hearing it (within 21 days of filing it). The law also has a provision for dispute settlement through mediation.

Their liability, your right: The new law makes it mandatory for manufacturers, sellers or service providers to compensate consumers for defects or deficiency in products or services. Sharing of personal information of consumers is recognised as an unfair trade practice under the new law, which also proposes strict action against advertisers for misleading ads.
A new regulator: A national level regulatory authority known as the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) will have powers to initiate class action and enforce recall, refund or return of products unlike the existing consumer protection councils which are only advisory bodies.

The confusion: The government removed healthcare as one of the services to make the bill 'non-controversial'. While the CCPA will be a central regulator for consumer issues, there are other regulators for various sectors (like telecom, insurance), which leaves the scope for overlapping jurisdictions and confusion. While the law proposes a 21-day deadline for hearing complaints, the posts of president of consumer commissions are lying vacant in 118 of the 596 districts and as many as 362 posts of commission members are lying vacant. Similarly, the bill does not mention what qualifications are needed to be a member of the redressal body. This may lead to conflicts of interest if a current or former government employee ends up hearing a case involving the government, for instance. Some activists have also said that the multiplicity of options to complain — consumer courts, councils, sector regulators — will also end up confusing consumers. more  

View all 11 comments Below 11 comments
Unfortunately, there is too much of delay in the proceedings to resolve a complaint.Most of the manufacturers/dealers/service providers do not takt the consumer courts seriously. more  
A revised & consumer friendly law in place of the decades old law was the need of the hour to protect the interests of the consumers in the changed scenerio. more  
My comments on this subject, as uploaded in the TOI, are reproduced here:

'This exercise is nothing but am eye wash. I have been writing to several fora for the last 20 years that, every seller/producer of all products must be required to clearly mention in their respective webpages their email contact addresses so as to enable the dissatisfied/aggrieved consumers to at least reach the entity responsible for the production and sale of a defective product. For the last about 8 months, for example, I have been trying to reach the manufacturer of a nebulizer, marketed by Apollo Hospitals group. The email address of the concerned person given in the papers/website is clearly fake as my mails have invariably bounced back. My attempts at reaching Apollo through Messenger also yielded no response, while the Apollo outlet is merrily sitting right. All this because of the permissive latitude allowed to the big parties in the economy for obvious reasons. What is suggestive, however, is that the Apollo group had had statutory interaction with me during my very long stint in Chennai.' more  
Instead of framing a new Bill, the compensation and cost should have been made 10 times more. Then only the consumers will get empowered. The present amounts awarded are chickenfjoeed and does no justice to the consumer ; even the cost of transport in attending to 30 to 40 hearings is not recovered. more  
Every one should note that what has come to us is a mere copy of he bill which is passed by both the houses. It will become an act when published in the Gazette and will be applicable then. The Govt. have also to frame rules and Regulations to be framed by the Central Commissioner. When all this will come in our hand then only it will be appropriate to analyse in details more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • Even Unilever believes in Fictitious MRP

      One keeps hearing that FMCG companies operate on low margin but its actually not the case. See this attached example. Unilever top Fmcg publishes MRP of 530 for surf front loading washing powder bu...

      By Garima Sharma
    • Remdesevir Black-marketeering

      MRP and legal metrology teams, why are you inactive on this all important issue. Why are legal metrology inspectors not issuing warrants if any chemist or hospital is selling this medicine more tha...

      By Harsimran Kaur
    • Profiteering on masks by school

      See attached mask with logo of a school. The Govt needs to issue an order that no mask like this can be sold at obnoxious prices by school or the maximum prices that can be charged on a mask with b...

      By Sarika Bansal
    • Dual MRP violations

      Where are the legal metrology teams in India? See attached. Same mask MRP of 5000 and MRP of 12500 Open loot of Poor patient/consumer who doesnt know any better in times of COVID 19 . Sh...

      By Seema Shah
    • Who is responsible for administering essential goods

      Look at attached, changing the color of mask to saffron and selling for 21 rupees as opposed to 10 rupees. Where are the essential goods enforcement people and mrp controllers.

      By Nirmala Chauhan
    • Swiggy looting

      See attached how swiggy is charging above mrp for essentials. The Mrp of 500 gm Amul butter is Rs 235 (screenshot) @swiggy_in is selling it for Rs 285 + Rs 50 delivery fee + Rs 23 tax. ...

      By Sandhya Agarwal
    • Shared this from Connected Consumers

      online platform like (shopon ) also selling sanitizer above govt. control price i.e. rs 50 for 100 m

      By Mohit Kataria
    • Book Directors of Vishal Mega Mart under LM act

      My family charged for so many items above MRP. Will the Thane or central legal metrology controller book their directors under LM act and even Essential Commodities act. All evidence attached.

      By Shivani Khiste
    • Essential commodity rule violation

      Has the new rule of selling sanitizer 200 ml for 100 rupees not implemented yet? This company khadi is selling 100 ml for 160 which means 200 ml for 320. Utter loot. I am sha...

      By Shivani Batra
    • Shared this from Transforming India

      Every single person should vote on it and the test should also be added in essential commodities act so no one can loot people. LocalCircles u only did private path lab survey that I read in papers...

      By Sarita S
    • Sanitizer and Mask overcharging ON

      Despite the inclusion in EC act and what not, overcharging is continuing on masks and sanitizers in greater noida. Even companies like xiaomi are encouraging it. There dealers are chargi...

      By SN Mittal
Enter your email & mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

Please select a Circle that you want people to invite to.
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)