Fury of the meekest
By Brahma Chellaney, India Today,
January 13, 2014

America’s demeaning strip and cavity search of an Indian diplomat in breach of international norms has become a symbol of a once-flourishing bilateral relationship gone awry. The U.S. and India entered into a much-ballyhooed strategic partnership, not a patron-client relationship. With 27 military allies, the U.S., however, is used to a patron-client equation, not a partnership, which demands some degree of equivalence and mutual respect. It thus began to take India for granted, and appeared genuinely surprised that India reacted to Devyani Khobragade’s humiliation as if it were the proverbial straw threatening to break its back.
U.S.’s “problem” with India extends well beyond this episode. For example, almost one-third of all T visas it has issued worldwide to victims of extremely grave sex or labour trafficking have been to Indians, thus mocking the most-populous democracy’s judicial system. The manner in which it spirited out of India the family of Khobragade’s maid on T visas and with tax-exempt tickets improperly procured by its embassy, paradoxically, was tantamount to an act of state-sponsored trafficking. The action had an openly conspiratorial ring to it: No sooner had the U.S., playing global cop, “evacuated” the maid’s family from its home country than it arrested Khobragade.
Make no mistake: America would not have dared to arrest and strip search a Chinese or Russian diplomat for allegedly underpaying a maid because that would have invited swift and disproportionate retaliation. In fact, just one week before Khobragade’s arrest, Preetinder Singh Bharara—the rogue prosecutor in New York who likes to be addressed as “Preet” or “Pete” when in reality he is Mr. Pretender—charged a number of Russian diplomats and consular officials for defrauding Medicaid of $1.5 million. But before unveiling the charges, the defendants were allowed to leave the US.
What has been India’s response to the insults heaped on it, or what the incredible Manmohan Singh called “some hiccups”? Don’t let all the sound and fury spook you: India’s only response thus far has been to start withdrawing non-reciprocal privileges to US diplomatic and consular staff and their families.
In a classic case of impotent fury, India made no effort to try to penalize the U.S. Indeed, India did the exact opposite by rewarding America with a new mega-contract—a $1.01-billion deal for additional C-130J military aircraft. Its demand for a formal apology has dissipated. It did not even hold back its new ambassador from taking charge in Washington until the U.S. made some amends. Why blame the U.S. for taking liberties when India’s toadying foreign minister has hailed NSA’s notorious global surveillance as “only a computer study” and “not snooping”?
Indeed, no Indian is asking the key question: Why did India in the first place unilaterally extend the privileges to U.S. diplomatic and consular staff that it is now withdrawing? India’s servility went to the extent of granting family members of U.S. consular officials a degree of diplomatic immunity for which they were ineligible. Ignoring its own security protocol, India handed out identity-less airport passes usable by any diplomat or consular official. India’s VVIPs, often seeking visas and other favours for their relatives, blocked New Delhi’s Nyaya Marg (the road behind the U.S. Embassy) to graciously allow U.S. Embassy personnel to visit the American Club without having to cross a public street.
New Delhi made no effort over the years to ensure that those working in American schools and other non-diplomatic U.S. government facilities in India were employed in compliance with Indian labour laws, which mandate, among other things, income tax and provident fund deductions. U.S. diplomats’ spouses worked in American schools and other U.S. facilities without seeking host-nation permission or paying taxes on their earnings. India turned a blind eye to such violations, which, if they occurred in the U.S., would land a violator in serious trouble, possibly even in jail.
India has now asked a reluctant U.S. Embassy to supply all the relevant details. Will the Embassy come clean? Who will crack the enforcement whip? India’s compromised governing elites?
There is yet another unanswered question: When there was a non-bailable Indian warrant against Khobragade’s absconding maid, how did Indian immigration allow her family to leave on “T” visas? True, a family cannot be liable for an absconding member. Yet Indian immigration and intelligence should have smelt a rat that the family was leaving on “trafficking” visas.
Clearly, Indian authorities have a lot to answer for. India—having absorbed no lesson from the case involving U.S. informant David Headley—must blame itself for inviting the latest outrage. Indeed, what was billed as India’s atypically tough response has ended in a whimper, reinforcing the country’s lamb-like image. more  

Yes Rajaji, thank you for this post once again more  
Chakreshji. Dood ka Dood aur Pani ka Pani ho gaya. Pol khul gai hai. more  
This is great and best expressed feelings of what most Indians feel, but we have many pseudo persons in our country acting as pseudo champions of the poor maid who forget their self esteem , esteem of the country and keep harping on torture of the maid forgetting what maid and her family did and used all means to get to USA even used US Govt to traffick them. more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • Seeking help with the Indian Visa

      Dear External Affairs Minister Mrs. Swaraj We appeal to your good nature. I am an Indian-born US Citizen and almost all of my extended family is in India. I am married to a Ka...

      By Anurag Kabra
    • Dear Members, I am a NRI, until now did not opened any NRI bank account, all of my earning send to India to my father account for saving. Kindly advise how it will consider legally, the savings are...

      By Mohamed Jafar Ali Ismail Mian
    • Cousin with Cash

      My cousin in chicago is visiting india this week and he has 24500 in old cash, landing in chennai. Where should she be going to exchange the money?

      By Mukta Somani
    • Ambassadors in India and abroad

      I have a suggestion. Can local circles or ministry of external affairs please invite all ambasaddors of foreign countries or their offices and india's ambassadors in foreign countries to this circl...

      By Laxmi Jindal
    • OCI & old currency notes

      Just found out today that I am unable to change my old Rupee currency as a OCI card holder. Only NRI are allowed to do this and i thought I was same as a NRI. In future will have to think seri...

      By Mohinder Singh

      wrote the below appeal to RBI : From: <> Date: Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:20 PM Subject: NRI CLARIFICATION Pleas...

      By Mayur Vora

      We are coming to Mumbai on 1st Feb to go to RBI to deposit Old Notes. SEEK CLARIFICATIONS My parents were from India. I was born in India but brought to Singapore when I was 3 month...

      By Mayur Vora

      I am a Singapore citizen. I am holding an OCI (converted from PIO by law). According to my bank I am a NRI. So I need confirmation that I can deposit my old notes to RBI, as under NRI rules. C...

      By Mayur Vora
    • Rs25,000 only

      Rs25,000 allowed by NRI to bring into India is just too little. It should be at least 1lakh. This is the amount usually in hand. Why, becuase 1lakh in India for NrIs fly off our wallet like a bulle...

      By Mayur Vora
    • NRIs and demonetisation - bikram vohra

      I think this is articulated much better by Bikram Vohra ji then I could have. Of all the absurd rules and regulations that have come out of this demonetisation exercise, the one on Mond...

      By Asha Rathi
    • NRIS in fix

      There are some new rules now where NRIs before they can deposit their money need clearance from custome officials at airport. This is ridculous. If someone has 60000 of gifts money in a ...

      By Asha Rathi
Enter your email and mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

All My Circles
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)