My Constitutional Rights

Signed 3/3000
Online Signatures: 3
President of India
>> October 10, 2017: Plea filed in SC challenging the constitutional validity of Section 497 of IPC, by an NRI from Kerala, Joseph Shine, who in his petition said Section 497 was “prima facie unconstitutional on the ground that it discriminates against men and violates Article 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution”.
>> December 8: SC agrees to examine the constitutional validity of penal provision on adultery.
>> January 5, 2018: SC refers to a five-judge Constitution bench the plea challenging the validity of the penal law on adultery.
>> July 11: Centre tells SC that striking down Section 497 will destroy the institution of marriage.
>> August 1: Constitution bench commences hearing.
>> August 2: SC says matrimonial sanctity is an issue but the penal provision on adultery is apparently violative of the right to equality under the Constitution.
>> August 8: Centre favours the retention of penal law on adultery, says it is a public wrong which causes mental and physical injury to the spouse, children and the family.
>> August 8: SC reserves verdict on pleas challenging the constitutional validity of the penal law on adultery in the hearing that went on for six days.
>> September 27: SC holds Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code as unconstitutional and strikes down the penal provision.
What was the hurry in considering the above, when 3 crore litigations are pending? Was it a matter of NATIONAL IMPORTANCE? On one hand the courts shout of shortage of benches and on the other hand priority is given to such non-productive matters.
Election petitions are heard overnight, whereas criminal matters are pending for decades.
Right to pray is decided fast but right to many other things which affect the citizen's life is decided after decades.
Civil matters are not decided during complainant's life-time, only to leave behind a legacy and a cost to him.
Ordinary "Citizen" does not get relief but a "criminal" politician gets instant relief.
Have we lost directions? Or have we formed the habit of sensationalising matters like politicians? Is the Supreme Court devoting more and more time to such matters at the cost of delaying normal cases, which are taking a life-time of a civilised citizen?
If such matters have to be considered on priority, let there be separate constitutional courts only to hear such matters, so that they do not hinder the normal process of law. Let there be seperate courts to decide PILs and assertions of rights and liberties of a citizen.
Do not mix up these with the normal cases. Or fix a time frame for all matters like an assurance that I will get justice within 2 years of filing my petition.
The Petition was also marked to:
Prime Minister of India
This is a big Task involving the whole Society like the poisoned Caste Based Reservations. S.C. faced a lot till 95, now set to the Parliament amidst increasing International imbibes in our composite society. Law Recognition to Sexual intercourse as natural exercise of physical body itself is the root cause that grossly set aside the Scientific Recognition of Sex and Sexual Desire which stands on the development of Hormones and Glands.
The increasing individual aspiration towards Sex while on imbibe inspired one to approach Court of Law on Sec. 497 ignoring relevant Chapter on Offences relating to Marriage as a whole that to be amended taking into the whole Society , Safety and Security into account.
Dr. Ambedkar was afraid off Fraternity amidst jealousy , antipathy and rivalry with Casticism describing as not only anti-social, but also anti-national ; and now, there is another Challenge in the name of Gender-wise rights for Sex ‘on the concept of recognition to it as natural exercise of physical Body’ as was internationally concluded.
Sex and Sexual intercourse Scientifically is the result of Hormones that develop in the Body and, is natural at 11 years in Females and 13 years in Males generally. The Laws that ignored this Scientific truth, had recognized Sex as natural exercise of physical body legally . Why Law cannot regard the Scientific Base ? had been the long continued issue of injustice and challenge to Human-quality and Human-nature. The IPC ON OFFENCES RELATING TO MARRIAGE set aside this Scientific mandate that tenders Sex and due to this, many had been deprived and thus lead to opt unlawful , illegal fulfillment of this Sexual natural Desire WHERE SOME FACING COURT CASES AND PUNISHMENTS ; SOME ARE RESORTING TO SUICIDES OR ABORTIONS ; SOME ARE LATER SUBJECTED TO DIVORCE just only on this cause.
It is now, in the Hands of Parliamentarians to amend and enact realizing vested responsibility under the mandate of Article 51 A - e and f . more  
Sep 29
Oct 03

Related Petitions

    • We require donor very urgently,

      Hello , Are you interested to selling one of your k1dney due to financial break down for a good amount of AMOUNT 3 core PAYMENT PROCEDURE 50% ADVANCE 1.5 crore BEFORE SURGERY AND BALANCE 50% AFTER ...

      By Dr. Med. Sascha Flohe
    • can I suite against a corporation that, they forcibly taken resignation letter from a General M

      I Suresh S joined in the company in 2012 and working hard for the company, but all of a sudden in the Month of March 2019 head HR asked me to submit resignation, that I have not done, so they ...

      By Babji SADASIVUNI
    • Misuse of housing owners societies funds

      Executive members of housing owners societies missed nearly 2 crores of collected funds from common association accounts .

      By Venkateswara Rao Chaganti
    • FF Bullying Ground Floor . What to do .

      I am Ground Floor . HN 16 First Floor Himalaya Apartment Sec 2 Rohini Delhi 85 used to pour water in morning since years through her window to GF . Repaired and put marbles on her balcony...

      By Pradeep Padhy
    • Domestic Violence

      Hello this is Sandeep singh Nagra 9724928501 just want to clarify without permission and offence picking anyone is offence my wife is want to use org for her personal profit ...

      By Sandeep Singh Nagra
    • Cheating by Country club

      Country club had taken RS 65,000/- from us for giving us membership of their clubs all over India and had assured that for family functions we will be allowed to use their facilities including lawn...

    • advocate using his degree for threatening of legal case

      A Advocate practicing at Delhi through a criminal complaint case in the year 2017, got an FIR registered ( On November 2018) against my son at Tis Hazari Court. Dates mentioned on comp...

      By Iqbal Singh
    • About the net speed of 4G and ignorance by telecom companies

      The normal 4G speed is approx 15mbps but we get less and even less than 100kbps as I have got and other airtel users also. I have a request to all who is facing the same problem please help me...

      By Dinesh Yogi
    • Disruption in both houses of parliament

      All of us wait for the parliament session to see the bills are debated and passed. Instead we see MPs jumping into the well and forcing adjournments. It seems no MP is interested in debating the i...

      By Sham Lal Langer
    • 3 decades of SBI inflicted litigation

      30 years of SBI inflicted litigation on this Senior Citizen of Haryana continues to scare unending adjournments that too with open unlimited budget for spending on fleecing Advocates on the panel ...

      By Surrender Singal
    • where to get justice for professional misconduct of lawyers

      I filled professional misconduct (refusal to return my case papers and wasted five years without replying my communications) of my advocate in Bar council. After three years of trail, Bar Counci...

      By Nithya Jothi
Share To
Enter your email & mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

Please select a Circle that you want people to invite to.
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)