Even in defeat, Aam Aadmi Party still matters - SA Aiyar

I have long been allergic to mainline political parties. On election day, I typically go to the polling booth, look at the photos of candidates, and vote for the bestlooking independent.

I did not vote this time because I was abroad. But I made a donation to the AAP. It often makes me tear my hair, yet it’s important to support the only party that does not depend on extorted black money, or on any caste, region or religion.

Mainline political parties are the biggest business houses in India. Once, people joined politics for public service, but now they do so to get rich. They move effortless from one party to another in search of profit, with no sense of guilt or taint. The CSDS says parties will spend Rs 30,000 crore on this election. Obviously, they will seek to recoup their outlay with interest. That means gigantic extortion.

Even “honest” people in mainline parties say black money is a regrettable necessity. Manmohan Singh’s “coalition dharma” meant co-opting crooks to garner a Parliamentary majority. On the same logic, parties choose candidates with no principles but lots of money and muscle. There’s an unspoken conspiracy among parties to block police-judicial reforms aimed at quick convictions, for all parties have many skeletons in their cupboards.

This was exemplified in the Jain hawala case of the 1990s. While investigating hawala deals, the police accidentally found diaries showing payments by the Jain brothers to top politicians of all major parties. The Congress worthies included VC Shukla, Madhavrao Scindia and ND Tiwari. The opposition worthies included LK Advani, Devi Lal and Sharad Yadav.

All parties conspired to hush up the affair. But a journalist persuaded the Supreme Court to order a formal CBI investigation. However, political pressure plus lack of police competence ensured that the investigation and prosecution was so weak that nobody was found guilty.

Every party accuses others of corruption, yet none ensures reforms that will quickly convict crooks. We get a plethora of allegations but nothing concrete. Courts verdicts take forever, so influential crooks generally die of old age before being convicted beyond all appeals. This system gives crooked politicians and businessmen a clear advantage over honest ones, and in time entrenches corruption in all politics and business.

Anger against this unspoken conspiracy of mainline parties led to the explosion of public anger in the Anna Hazare movement. It was fuelled by public anger over reports of the CAG about major scams in telecom and coal. The government was obliged to investigate these scams. Yet after several years of investigation and prosecution, it is far from clear that anybody will be convicted beyond appeals.

The CBI has failed to find any evidence for prosecution in most coal block allocations. One reason is that police investigative capabilities are weak, and there’s no political interest in making them really effective. A truly effective police might be very inconvenient for corrupt politicians.

This system must be smashed. Narendra Modi is seen by many as somebody who can change the system from within. I suspect only a newcomer, like the AAP, can truly attack the system. I may disagree strongly with AAP leader Prashant Bhushan on economic policy, but salute his emphasis on quick justice and checking judicial corruption.

People ask, am I not disillusioned with the AAP’s populism, crazy statements, and unending but unsubstantiated allegations of corruption? Up to a point yes, but I never expected much better. An anti-corruption movement brings together diverse people. When that movement is converted into a party, contradictions will emerge. Chaotic sloganeering and populism will follow.

Yet for all the populist socialism that AAP leaders initially mouthed, its economic committee finally produced an excellent policy document. Kejriwal told the Financial Times, “It is only private business which can create wealth and employment in this country. Indians are born entrepreneurs. Yet the government has been acting as an obstacle in everyone’s business. It is so difficult to start and run a business in India unless you pay up money. All these laws and policies need to be simplified, but then the government’s job should be to ensure the laws are followed.” This is a classical liberal position, and I can only cheer.

By resigning from the Delhi government, the AAP has spoiled its short-term prospects. It may win just a few seats in Parliament. No matter: it can enliven the opposition. If it establishes itself as a thorn in the flesh of mainline parties, keeping up the pressure for police-judicial reform, then that will be a worthwhile achievement. more  

View all 6 comments Below 6 comments
Yes i too agree with Pritam ji. MOTTOS & ideology never dies. People may come and people may go but core values remain same. more  
AAP has clearly understood its supporter's views and it has developed its on views and agenda for new government and it is definitely not supporting any party.It will act as an Umpire in this whole process and take apt step in preventing and investigating frauds. more  
He has not taken support of CONG. The CONG went to governor & deliberately said they support AAP. Let us think if he not formed Govt.in that case, the entire people would have said that he cant full fill his promises that's why he has left the field .More over he has taken the support of public & formed the Govt.and showed a sample of what he can done ,no others cant done in last 10-15 years.To fix him in the govt.itself a conspiracy.Have you ever heard that a party short of 2-3 seats not doing horse trading to form a govt.in INDIA. There lies the whole drama. more  
If resignation was correct then he should not have taken support of congress and formed the govt .you mean to say that more  
Don't be such partial.The resignation was indeed a correct step.This not a party or individual come here to stick to seats compromising to the core values . Think even to resign for a peon post is very difficult .let you try once on any moral issue in your life. We have seen parties like BJP & CONG sticking to their seats with out any ideology & making collations with any body to form the govt. Though MODI not corrupt directly he has supporting ADANIS & AMBANIS and taking fund from them there by benefiting after formation of govt.He has the tag of Gujarat riots on his back.(what ever courts say the people of this country know what is what .By this kind of judgments court loss their integrity. Nothing else.) one who devoted for country say that in emotion but not say those who not support modi are Pakistanis.
Even ATALJI resigned in parliament before going to vote of confidence. Even ADVANI resigned on a simple allegation.They are some individuals with moral values.But these modis ,eeduuarrappa,sriramulu ,amitsha,kapil sibbal,shiladikshit etc list is long cant compare with them and have no moral rights to talk about leaders like ARVIND etc. more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • Bribery hitting peak during COVID-18

      Bribes are back friends and organisations like Transparency International are not doing much. Bribes being taken openly from migrants who already have tokens for train and bus travel. P...

      By Ajay Kumar
    • Why Govt bodies need intermediaries?

      Wondfo, a Chinese company accused of supplying 'faulty' rapid testing kits to ICMR, manufactures it for $3 (Rs 225) a unit. Somehow, instead of procuring them directly from Wondfo, ICMR has engaged...

      By Vinita Agrawal
    • Alerting Administrators

      When demand is more than supply corruption creeps in. Talking to 4 vendors in past 2 days, I get a strong sense that fruit veggie vendors are paying bribes to police and have built that in the pric...

      By Sudesh Rai
    • Yes Bank - Corporate Kickbacks

      Kickbacks, the ugly lesser reported truth of white collar crime in Indian wholesale banking. If anything all of this makes more sense when I recall a conversation with someone who was puzzled why R...

      By Amit Mishra
    • Truck bribes

      Gujarat is the cleanest state with minimum bribes. MP border charges Rs1500/- per truck for entry and likewise for exit. Its daylight robbery. Multiple complaints have fallen on deaf ears. Its like...

      By Amit Gupta
    • 48000 crores paid in bribe by truck drivers

      All these corrupt transport departments Are Still making money if we believe this survey. This is ridiculous. Will the CM of BJP states like Haryana UP Gujarat Karnataka answer???

      By Rohit Jain
    • Good Budget announcement on Citizen Charter for Tax payers

      This was a good move announced by FM. Can we please share our inputs via this circle as the subject has been extensively discussed. The feedback for what should be in charter of citizens should com...

      By Reeta Kumar
    • Shared this from Transforming India

      Every member of the circle please vote on this poll. The Govt needs to know whether or not NRC will cause corruption problems.

      By Naina Mittal
    • corruption in bocw deptt.

      there is rampant corruption in every state to issue labour licenses as well as permit under bocw as well as migrant workers license.the fee is fixed per person;even though the procedure is to apply...

      By Suresh Dasarathy
    • Corruption under BOCW act is a must

      I am writing this on behalf of my husband who is in the EPC business. According to him corruption under BOCW act is a must. BOCW stands for benefits of construction worker and all busin...

      By Sandhya Agarwal
    • Reliance Finance lending to indirectly linked borrowers

      There is attached news today saying that Reliance Home Finance lent 12000 crores of money to a set of potentially indirectly linked borrowers? Who the hell is investigating this. How many more bad ...

      By Amit Mishra
Enter your email & mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

Please select a Circle that you want people to invite to.
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)