CBI's Ranjit Sinha is the symptom - Sucheta Dalal

Activist and advocate Prashant Bhushan has rendered yeoman service by informing the Supreme Court of India about the goings-on at the residence of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) director Ranjit Sinha. He added substance to his allegation that CBI’s Mr Sinha was going slow on various mega scam investigations by revealing the list of visitors to Mr Sinha’s home; and the list is truly startling.

Key functionaries of the Anil Ambani group allegedly met Mr Sinha 50 times in 15 months. The accused in every major scam under CBI’s investigation, including controversial meat-exporter and alleged hawala-dealer Moin Akhtar Qureshi, have been frequenting Mr Sinha’s home; some even thrice a day. This is gross impropriety. The Supreme Court has issued a notice to Mr Sinha even as CBI tried to gag the media.

As an aside, we also discover the CBI chief’s maharaja-like lifestyle. The Economic Times says he has seven cooks, 22 domestic helpers and a cobbler at his disposal, all paid by the exchequer. That the CBI director, who is lower than a joint secretary in the pecking order of government, can live like a king, tells you how our public funds are being misused.

The sordid episode throws light on the various investigating arms of the government. The CBI director has immense power over the lives and reputations of individuals, companies and institutions in India. He can initiate, or close, investigations at will; arrest people or destroy careers without accountability, to please political masters. The income-tax and enforcement departments and the department of revenue intelligence (DRI) are equally willing handmaidens when it comes to working on political instructions.

A slow judicial system with its propensity to remain silent about judicial corruption, as has been revealed by Justice Makrandey Katju on his blog, dissuades people from fighting back. The few, who do, often end up broken and frustrated by the system at every turn.

The misuse of government investigation agencies began almost immediately after independence but peaked under United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. We saw a decade when unbridled corruption and mind-boggling scams were allowed to flourish in the name of ‘coalition dharma’.

The lay public may be shocked at reports about the CBI chief’s visitors, but many of us in the media have been helpless spectators of this gross corruption over the decades. Helpless because those who blithely give out details about corrupt people and practices will do nothing to stop it nor provide proof to allow publication.

• Consider some reactions that I have heard in the week that Mr Sinha was making news.
An IIM professor who conducted a training programme for senior income-tax officers was reportedly told by one attendee “some of us are losing Rs1 crore a day attending this programme.” We frequently hear from government insiders that top income-tax and police appointments, especially in Delhi and Mumbai, are auctioned. How do we prove it, when there are no whistleblowers?

• A senior RBI (Reserve Bank of India) official names a couple of bank chairmen who, he thought, were more likely candidates for CBI’s sting operation on Syndicate Bank and Bhushan Steel. He claims that one chairman was cautioned by RBI after reports about his corrupt ways escalated. He cannot say why no action was initiated against him, instead of issuing a mere word of caution. The rise in corruption at banks is in direct proportion to the ballooning of bad loans even as RBI remains a silent spectator.

• We have been hearing about a finance ministry bureaucrat who was exceedingly rude and humiliating to bank chairmen. Rampant corruption was also one of his qualities that has attracted the PM’s attention. Is the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) only a bugbear for mid-career bureaucrats? Isn’t it curious that neither CVC nor CBI has such corrupt bureaucrats in its crosshairs?

• The Serious Frauds Office of the United Kingdom brought corruption charges against Alstom (UK) for allegedly paying a bribe of over three million euros to the Delhi Metro Rail officials in 2001 to secure a contract for a train control, signalling and telecommunications system. It reminds us of how the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) under CB Bhave wound up an investigation into the round-tripping of a massive $250 million into Reliance Communications with a consent order and no admission of guilt. Anil Ambani’s Reliance ADAG paid just Rs50 crore and managed a vague and opaque public disclosure without admission of guilt, even though the Financial Services Authority (FSA) of the UK issued a far more explicit order and also fined the UBS bankers $2 million.

Can we expect this to change? Prime minister Narendra Modi has made several clear commitments to the people of India. “We have to create systems where there is no injustice against anybody,” he tweeted. More specifically, he promised to act as a ‘chowkidar’ (guard) who would prevent the plunder of national wealth. “I will neither take a bribe not allow anyone else to accept one,” he has said.

We know this is easier said than done. Other than a rumour about the PM having actually asked the son of a senior leader to return a bribe, we have yet to see any change down the line, especially in regulatory and investigation agencies.

Conflict of interest often breeds corruption. The government is working on the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill, 2013, but who really believes it will make a difference? Then there is the lapsed private member’s Bill on conflict of interest introduced in the Rajya Sabha by Dr EMS Natchiappan.

A multi-disciplinary group of NGOs called the Alliance against Conflict of Interest (AACI) is working to resurrect and improve on it by putting together a detailed note with documented cases of how conflict breeds corruption and skews policy-making and regulation in diverse areas—from education to public health, food, safety, environment or finance.

Transparency International, a global NGO that tracks corruption, defines ‘conflict of interest’ as “any situation where an individual or an entity, whether a government, business, media outlet or civil society organisation, is confronted with choosing between the duties and demands of their position and their own private interests.”

In India, every position is influenced by corruption or nepotism and duty is never a consideration. This is at its worst when it comes to public servants and bureaucrats. While politicians face the ballot every five years, corrupt bureaucrats can damage the system for decades, especially when they are due to retire.

Even the most egregious cases of conflict, where retiring bureaucrats or chairmen of nationalised banks, insurance companies or regulatory bodies have immediately accepted lucrative advisory positions or board directorships with private and foreign companies, are rarely questioned. The mandatory cooling-off period is usually invoked only as an act of revenge rather than regular discipline.

The AACI points out how policies that decide people’s livelihoods and set standards for their food and health are set by advisory bodies/groups/committees that are riddled with conflict of interest. Powerful corporate influence is visible everywhere. This was legitimised over the past decade under the guise of public-private partnerships, such as the PHFI (Public Health Foundation of India), which also obtained huge tracts of land and funding from Union and state governments.

Conflict of interest is just as destructive when it works in a covert fashion, where powerful corporate and vested interests influence policy-makers to engage only with NGOs under their control and influence.

The consequence is bad law, unfair systems, more litigation and, in the worst case, public anger and protests. Suppressing any discussion on these issues in the mainstream media is another manifestation of the conflict-corruption nexus which is even harder to break. more  

Dear Mr Saxena I have only tried to convey the correct position of the Director CBI as against Jt. Secy. and nothing more. I endorse the views expressed in the post. Action, if any, against the Director CBI could be only after Supreme Court verdict in the on going case more  
Mr. Bhargava I think you are missing the point... I think the post was meant to highlight the blatant misuse of power and authority by a senior bureaucrat. It is pathetic that he i still in position. I can very clearly say that while "Change does begin with me" we realy need to kick some ass here... as citizens, members of judiciary or the powers to be.... more  
Rajeshji may like to note that the post of Director CBI is senior to the post of Joint Secretary in Bureaucracy . It is different matter that a Joint Secy. in the Ministry may dictate to CBI on certain issues. more  
Excellent post more  
Rajesh ji Excellent post... Congratulations... On 16 Sep 2014 20:15, "Rajesh Suri" wrote: > more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • New ways to loot public money

      Dhoots, the owners of bankrupt Videocon owe Rs. 64,000 crores to taxpayers (banks). Under the brilliant bankruptcy law enacted by Govt, the banks can recover only 4% of this amount. The b...

      By Ajay Agrawal
      /
    • Anti- Corruption

      My understanding/opinion The amended 2018 Prevention of Act is in favour of the corruption. The CBI cannot even register a corruption case against a public servant without the approval of the ...

      By Lucian I D P
      /
    • Bribery to Bureaucrats and Politicians

      One of the most common ways companies, Builders, Businessmen bribe Bureaucrats Politicians Doctors and any others on the receiving end is to buy an expensive vehicle and give it to them for use.

      By Garima Sharma
      /
    • Loot by bad corrupt business through banks

      Yesterday, banks wrote off 50,000 cr loans by the Videocon group & sold the company for 5000 cr. Today banks wrote off ~ 5000 cr loans by Siva group & sold the company back to hi...

      By SN Mittal
      /
    • Where did Covid Hospital Bribery happen

      https://www.localcircles.com/a/pub...

      By Naina Mittal
      /
    • advt in leading newspapers across india a few days ago

      two days back there was a quarter page advt.in many leading newspapers across india by a company called Landomus Usa.the company said that it would invest equity of usd 500billion,in phase 1, in in...

      By Suresh Dasarathy
      /
    • Together Against Corruption

      Needless to say,the corruption is in our blood. In Covid pandemic:we could have done better,but the "C" factor influences most of the business and political communities. 1. Remdesiv...

      By ANANTPADMAKAR AYYA
      /
    • Neta Corruption through Police

      This is also an example of corruption that prevails in every state of India pretty much. Corrupt Neta ji sets targets and then get machinery to collect. Machinery collects a bit more and...

      By Vikram Gupta
      /
    • Our halla on transport corruption worked

      Ministry of Road Transport has launched Aadhar-authentication based contactless services Now applying for learner' s license, DL renewal & duplicate DL, registration application for...

      By RN Chopra
      /
    • Corruption in Resident welfare Associations

      I am a member of a resident welfare association. Recently (28.12.20) I demanded an inspection of documents including an advocate's bill reportedly paid for a huge and disproportionate amount to def...

      By LOGANATHAN KOTHANDARAMAN
      /
    • Conversation between Republic CEO and BARC - Ex CEO from Mumbai Police

      Please find attached chat transcript between Arnab Goswami of Republic and ex BARC CEO. Highlights corruption in media esp in regards to TRP scams. Also shows who is aligned with who. The biggest s...

      By Anonymous Circle member
      /
Share
Enter your email and mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

All My Circles
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)