ANTI CORRUPTION INITIATIVE AT THE TIME OF SELECTION OF CANDIDATE
This is to appraise below ~
Present ~ While the decision to allotted the permission/ticket to a candidate is being taken by party chief or designates. The party procedure is being followed or being deviated in special cases.
Proposed ~ While deciding its candidate, party gets biased to select the candidate ignoring its (candidate) social status, criminal status, corruptions charges being prosecuted in court of law. And the tickets are being allotted to corrupt and criminals who already had been jailed or being prosecuted in court of law. Hence, corruption and crime is not getting reduced.
Proposed~Approval of candidate may be done by autonomous body i.e. Election commission or body under President. This body should take care of candidates social status, criminal records and corruption charges or cases being prosecuted in court of law. And also the procedure of party to select the candidate. Party concerned, its chief or designates may decide the candidate while following its internal procedure and forward to the Autonomous body, i.e. Election Commission or else, for its final approval. Area/constituency to be decided by party and or candidate.
Thanks, request not to take otherwise. I am 100% with AAP even if all goes away. more
Take an example of Sazia Ilmi, Party decided her as best and strong candidate to fight against the UPA Chairperson. But she refused and proved that she have some other ambitions within her for which AAP has already displayed a warning on big board. more