Some people are raising questions on Arvind himself for challenging the rigidity of our judicial systems.

These people need to introspect and decide if they want to live with the existing system or at least morally support a person who's challenging it.

कुछ लोग अरविन्द के बेल ना लेने के फैसले पर सवाल उठा रहे हैं. उनको तरह तरह की उल्हनाएं दे रहे हैं!

उन लोगों से कुछ सवाल हैं:

१. जब पुलिस वाला FIR नही लिखता तो जनता कहती है के कानून गलत है और कानून के रखवाले भी |
२. जब किसी आरोपी को सालों साल जेल नही होती तो यही जनता कहती है के न्याय प्रणाली कमज़ोर है जो न्याय नही देती |
३. अब जब की श्री नितिन गडकरी जी द्वारा एक केस दो लोगो के खिलाफ लगाया गया, एक अरविन्द और दूसरे दिग्विजय सिंह पर, तो अरविन्द को पेशी पर बुलाया और ज़मानत राशि देने को कहा गया और न ज़मा करने पर जेल, तो न्याय प्रणाली एक दम से अच्छी कैसे हो गयी?

सब जानते है की न्यायपालिका इस केस को कितना लम्बा खींच सकती है और ये भी जानते हैं की अरविन्द चाहे तो २ मिनट में बेल बांड भरकर बाहर आ भी सकते है. लेकिन लोगो की सोच को क्या हुआ?

आज भी देश में हजारों लोग सिर्फ़ इसलिए सालों से जेल में सड़ रहे हैं क्यूंकि उनके पास बेल भरने के पैसे नहीं हैं. अरविन्द ने न्यायपालिका की जड़ता का विरोध करने जैसा मज़बूत कदम उठाया है. फिर भी उनको ही दोषी बताया जा रहा है.

आपमें से जिन्होंने पुलिस और न्यायालय के चक्कर काटे हैं वो समझ सकते हैं की अरविन्द किस चीज़ के विरुद्ध खड़ा हुआ है. आज तक कितने लोगों ने ऐसी हिम्मत दिखाई है?

जब किसी ने अब ये हिम्मत दिखाई है तो कम से कम हम उसका समर्थन करके इस व्यवस्था की जड़ता को चुनौती देने में कम से कम सैद्धांतिक रूप से उसका साथ तो दे ही सकते हैं. more  

View all 29 comments Below 29 comments
Do you think that this email is a spam ? Click here

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
captsatish
59 ans

Your friend captsatishsharma send you this invitation !

Discuss with him and see his pictures on inter-chat :-)

See more...


Here are some of the latest registered :

[IMAGE]
Krishnapri
35 ans

[IMAGE]
nath.bhara
56 ans

[IMAGE]
js.ramya14
22 ans

[IMAGE]
SUNNY3
42 ans

[IMAGE]
msarala332
26 ans

[IMAGE]
athul
27 ans

[IMAGE]
yasmeenban
29 ans

[IMAGE]
risingranv
29 ans

[IMAGE]
jaisree787
23 ans

[IMAGE]
sampathrao
23 ans

[IMAGE]
dorris
44 ans

[IMAGE]
lokefearle
23 ans

See more...
Click here to login on Inter-chat

You received this invitation because your friend captsatishsharma registered on inter-chat and wants
to invite you.
To stop receiving e-mails from inter-chat, click here

Inter-chat is edited by the company bacto-net (RCS LILLE - 512 366 378)
21 avenue le Corbusier - 59042 Lille (France)

[IMAGE] more  
Thanks Sudarshanji. Today, I found lot of interesting facts and views on AAP's website. Maybe you'd like to read some of them, if you have the time. (www.aamaadmiparty.org). There are some stories about how poor people are suffering for decades because of this gap in the law. Anyway, let us see what the High Court has to say. more  
Kewal ji; I do agree that Yogendra Yadav ji explained in that way. To my understanding, bail bond is to kind of ensure that the person obeys the order for appearance in the court when required. This is where judge can use discretion which in turn depends upon the person's credentials and perhaps paying ability. In this case, AK's credentials as we all know, are of the highest order and so also of YY. In a way Judge did not accept AK's credentials sound enough and YY accepted to sign bail bond for the sake of his personal convenience without testing the Judge's judiciousness. So, while one accepted to challenge, the other did not. Now I take the real substance from your posting:"...lakhs of innocent people all over the country are rotting in jails, because they are too poor to pay the personal surety a la Arvind ? That is the status of justice in our country. Arvind has drawn attention to a very important lacuna in our judicial system. This law has been there since British days ! Needs to be changed". more  
Dear M/S Puneet and Sudarshan Goyal, I do not know who is supposed to have replied to you. But I can share what I gathered from TV. On two occasions, I heard Yogesh Yadav explain this in detail. You see, the two cases are different. In AK's case, no crime had been committed by him. He had been asked to appear before the court and then get a bail for appearing on the next date. He refused. In YY's case, an offence is supposed to have been committed because they violated Section 144. So, he was ARRESTED. Nothing of that sort happened with Arvind. (It is a different matter that AAP will prove in the next hearing of YY that Section 144 was not imposed as per the rules). Are you aware that lakhs of innocent people all over the country are rotting in jails, because they are too poor to pay the personal surety a la Arvind ? That is the status of justice in our country. Arvind has drawn attention to a very important lacuna in our judicial system. This law has been there since British days ! Needs to be changed. more  
महोदय, लोगों के विचार तो रंगे होते हैं, इस देश की सारी प्रणाली ही outdated हो गयी है। मुझे समझ में नहीं आता है कि अरविंद क्‍यों जमानत ले। ये सारे कानून अंग्रेजोे के बनाए हुए है, जिसे वे भारतीयों के खिलाफ दुरुपयोग करते थे। अब उन्‍हीं कानूनों का दुरुपयोग एक तथाकथित भारतीय दूसरे भारतीय के विरुद्ध उपयोग करता है। अंग्रेजों को तो भगा दिया, परंतु उनके हथियार का उपयोग किया जा रहा है सत्‍ता पक्ष द्वारा। अगर अरविंद को जेल भेजकर किसी का भला हो रहा है तो ठीक है, भला होने दो। एक दिन अरविंद का भी समय आएगा। more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • HAS PAKISTAN’S FUTURE BECOME QUESTION MARK ?

      The most serious problem faced by Pakistan today is due to the state of it’s economy, which appear to have become beyond redemption due to accumulated issues caused by mis governance and high...

      By N.S. Venkataraman
      /
    • WILL HOWDY MODI SERVE ANY PURPOSE ?

      Howdy Modi in Houston gets huge publicity in India. But, it is doubtful whether American media would give it similar importance. President Trump is going out of the way to keep Mr. Modi in good hum...

      By N.S. Venkataraman
      /
    • Article 370 eliminated

      Congratulations to Modi Government. 1st bold decision. Do work on the economy though...

      By Sheetal Jain
      /
    • RTI amendment

      Please find attached and fight the misinformation campaign.

      By Rajesh Suri
      /
    • Is it time for yet another demonetisation ?

      In 2016,when Prime Minister Narendra Modi demonetised high value currency notes of Rs. 1000 and Rs. 500, it shocked the nation as all the country men were caught unaware of. Mr. Modi explained that...

      By N.S. Venkataraman
      /
    • Will the $5 trillion economy be possible for India by 2024 ?

      After receiving massive mandate in recent parliament election and getting second term as Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi with his characteristic courage of conviction and confidence and...

      By N.S. Venkataraman
      /
    • Congress politicians may cross over to BJP

      candidates whose name I am hearing in Delhi Jyotiraditya Scindia Shashi Tharoor Milind Deora If anyone knows more, share.

      By Rajesh Suri
      /
    • Invitation for Swearing in Ceremony

      Modi ji gave attached invites to all VIPs, party workers, kins of party workers deceased in west bengal. For the next big event half the invites should be reserved for common citizens (s...

      By Rajesh Suri
      /
    • 1984 vs 2019

      Blue turns Orange. If Modi Govt does good work and Congress/3rd fromt rebuilds itself, one can assume it will take 35 years for Orange to turn Blue/Diff colour again

      By Rajesh Suri
      /
    • Muslims Support Modi as much

      Just watch people watch. Amazing Mandate!!!!

      By Rajesh Suri
      /
    • Media people must never go this low

      Unless they are desperately looking for a ticket

      By Rajesh Suri
      /
Share To
Enter your email & mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

Please select a Circle that you want people to invite to.
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)