TRAI & CABLE & DTH

At the end of the day, end users are taken for a ride, Pay for each channel, then watch advertisement, which consume major time part of serial/ movies etc.
The end viewers have no choice but agree to do what TRAI wants.
TRAI will do what they want. Complain goes to wastepaper Basket !
TRAI has been successful of extracting double money (including additional of GST) from End users. more  

View all 35 comments Below 35 comments
1) There should be a limit to advertisement.If you see it is more than 50% of the time.2) With new scheme Govt will also earn in the name of GST.Finally consumer has to spend more. more  
Without advertisement channels can not survive. But there should be some limit-time between programs. I&B ministry has guidelines, but it seems channels are two steps ahead of them. more  
Free channels have no income except from advertisements. But the pay channels are charging from public and earning from advertisements too.. more  
A Representation already made to the new I&B Minister https://twitter.com/vikkichoudhry/status/1134811281494401024 more  
Dear Sir, advertises in between TV programmes is certainly irritating but do we think about following.
1. In the era when a single cigarette cost more than Rs. 10 we are getting a news or entertainment channel for at as low as Re. 1/ per channel for entire month. Do we think that the cumulative collections from all connection holders will be enough to operate a channel. In the same way we get a daily newspaper at Rs. 3 or 4 that itself has a publishing and distribution cost of more than Rs. 50 per unit. In above context we can imagine that about 99 % of operating cost of a channel is born by advertisers and we the viewer contribute barely 1 % of the cost. Are we ready to bear the entire viewing cost a channel? Will it not become a luxury item once again?
2. We are aware that in 80s radios were almost free from advertisements and a license fee of Rs. 15 for one year was charged to buyer at the time of purchase of radio set and it was supposed that buyer will deposit Rs. 15 each year in post office to use the radio legally. Before Rajeev Gandhi government who abolished it and radios were made free to air and advertisers were made the source of earning for broadcasting operations. Thus, freeing the radio for listener was considered a great relief for common people at that time.
3. We all agree that today there is huge earning from advertises in this business which can be envisaged by mushrooming growth of new channels every year, but we think that advertisers pay channel operators based on the numbers of viewership and to retain viewers they have to improve the quality and accuracy of news otherwise they will lose viewers. If they are barred of earnings from advertisement it may get financed by some other source say donations or subsidy in that condition it may be very difficult to get any news free from biases and quality of news may get deteriorated. More than that if that happens television once again become a status symbol just out of reach from common people.
4. We are getting food not because of quantum of our earnings but because someone works hard to produce it in excess for others, imagine a condition if farmers stop growing food that in excess from self-consumption, we all were living in primitive stage busy in growing / hunting for food only.
In view of above do we expect TRAI can do any thing in this regard. I think free to air channels are most expensive than paid channels as we don’t have option to opt them out.
Thanks. more  
I agree with you, one thing is true, is that a personal TV should not be a banner for companies’ advertisement. Moreover, channel sellers and govt. controller will come into the line when we will able to do a system reform, you see the negotiable instrument act, and it is very old 1881. Whole Act was constituted by British; this was done to make their own benefit, especially for the benefits of companies and organisation but not for general public. This act needs to be reformed for the benefits of both buyers as well as consumers. After that I hope everyone will get their rights. Simple example I wanted to share to understand the negotiable instrument act is that when we are late for paying a particular bill, we will be charged a fine for late; when service or work delivery is late there is no fine or penalty. Negotiable instrument act gives cover or protect only one side but not both the parties. Think and comments me back. more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • Improving integrity of Online Reviews: Inputs on Solutions

      Below are some if the key issues outlined by you all with regards to Online Product Reviews on eCommerce sites. Kindly review them and share solutions that will help enable consumer access to unbia...

      By Dept. of Consumer Affairs (Government of India)
      /
    • Inflated MRP: Inputs on Issues

      Below are some of the key issues outlined by some of the members in regards to inflated MRPs. This pertains to certain category of products where the average sales prices is much lower than the MRP...

      By Dept. of Consumer Affairs (Government of India)
      /
    • Misleading Advertisements by eCommerce sites: Inputs on Issues

      Below are some of the key issues raised by you in regards to misleading advertisements by ecommerce sites. Kindly review the same and share any additional inputs you may have. We look forward to yo...

      By Dept. of Consumer Affairs (Government of India)
      /
    • Improving functioning of eCommerce Cashback Programs

      Below are some of the key solutions proposed by you to issues regarding eCommerce cashback programs. Kindly review the same and if you have any additional solutions, please share. We look...

      By Dept. of Consumer Affairs (Government of India)
      /
    • Online or ePharmacies - Inputs on Solutions

      Below are some of the key issues being reported on online or e-pharmacies and apps. With this post, we would like to seek your specific inputs on solutions that will help address these issues .

      By Dept. of Consumer Affairs (Government of India)
      /
    • Cheated by LG

      I purchased LG water purifier in the month of November last year. Since then I noticed that my family members including me have some health issues so after around 6 months I called LG professionals...

      By Pankaj Kumar
      /
    • IFB - Poor After Sales Service

      I have an IFB washing machine. I had paid for and taken extended warranty. Since last over one week it is not working. I made a complaint. For two days, no one attended the complaint. On ...

      By Praveen Kapur
      /
    • Apple phones are best leased for 2 years

      I must say cost of owning an apple phone is 3000 rupees a month or 100 rupees a day. The product is a fine product when its new and after 2 years they generally become pieces of junk.

      By Amit Mishra
      /
    • Solutions to improve workings of Online Travel Sites

      Below are some of the key issues outlined by you in regards to travel web sites in India. Kindly review them and share specific solutions that must be implemented to fix these issues. We look forw...

      By Dept. of Consumer Affairs (Government of India)
      /
    • Issues with DTH Service providers: Inputs Sought

      We have seen a large number of posts and comments on issues faced by people with DTH service providers. With this post, we would like to seek your inputs on the various issues you have ...

      By Dept. of Consumer Affairs (Government of India)
      /
    • eCommerce Guidelines: Inputs Sought

      Thousands of posts and comments have been received on ecommerce in our circles in the past few months. We are pleased to share with you that basis the inputs given to us in several posts and discu...

      By Dept. Of Consumer Affairs (Government of India)
      /
Share To
Enter your email & mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

Please select a Circle that you want people to invite to.
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)