At the end of the day, end users are taken for a ride, Pay for each channel, then watch advertisement, which consume major time part of serial/ movies etc.
The end viewers have no choice but agree to do what TRAI wants.
TRAI will do what they want. Complain goes to wastepaper Basket !
TRAI has been successful of extracting double money (including additional of GST) from End users. more  

View all 35 comments Below 35 comments
1) There should be a limit to advertisement.If you see it is more than 50% of the time.2) With new scheme Govt will also earn in the name of GST.Finally consumer has to spend more. more  
Without advertisement channels can not survive. But there should be some limit-time between programs. I&B ministry has guidelines, but it seems channels are two steps ahead of them. more  
Free channels have no income except from advertisements. But the pay channels are charging from public and earning from advertisements too.. more  
A Representation already made to the new I&B Minister more  
Dear Sir, advertises in between TV programmes is certainly irritating but do we think about following.
1. In the era when a single cigarette cost more than Rs. 10 we are getting a news or entertainment channel for at as low as Re. 1/ per channel for entire month. Do we think that the cumulative collections from all connection holders will be enough to operate a channel. In the same way we get a daily newspaper at Rs. 3 or 4 that itself has a publishing and distribution cost of more than Rs. 50 per unit. In above context we can imagine that about 99 % of operating cost of a channel is born by advertisers and we the viewer contribute barely 1 % of the cost. Are we ready to bear the entire viewing cost a channel? Will it not become a luxury item once again?
2. We are aware that in 80s radios were almost free from advertisements and a license fee of Rs. 15 for one year was charged to buyer at the time of purchase of radio set and it was supposed that buyer will deposit Rs. 15 each year in post office to use the radio legally. Before Rajeev Gandhi government who abolished it and radios were made free to air and advertisers were made the source of earning for broadcasting operations. Thus, freeing the radio for listener was considered a great relief for common people at that time.
3. We all agree that today there is huge earning from advertises in this business which can be envisaged by mushrooming growth of new channels every year, but we think that advertisers pay channel operators based on the numbers of viewership and to retain viewers they have to improve the quality and accuracy of news otherwise they will lose viewers. If they are barred of earnings from advertisement it may get financed by some other source say donations or subsidy in that condition it may be very difficult to get any news free from biases and quality of news may get deteriorated. More than that if that happens television once again become a status symbol just out of reach from common people.
4. We are getting food not because of quantum of our earnings but because someone works hard to produce it in excess for others, imagine a condition if farmers stop growing food that in excess from self-consumption, we all were living in primitive stage busy in growing / hunting for food only.
In view of above do we expect TRAI can do any thing in this regard. I think free to air channels are most expensive than paid channels as we don’t have option to opt them out.
Thanks. more  
I agree with you, one thing is true, is that a personal TV should not be a banner for companies’ advertisement. Moreover, channel sellers and govt. controller will come into the line when we will able to do a system reform, you see the negotiable instrument act, and it is very old 1881. Whole Act was constituted by British; this was done to make their own benefit, especially for the benefits of companies and organisation but not for general public. This act needs to be reformed for the benefits of both buyers as well as consumers. After that I hope everyone will get their rights. Simple example I wanted to share to understand the negotiable instrument act is that when we are late for paying a particular bill, we will be charged a fine for late; when service or work delivery is late there is no fine or penalty. Negotiable instrument act gives cover or protect only one side but not both the parties. Think and comments me back. more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • Jio fiber Giga

      I have registered a complaint against JIO GIGA fiber in consumer forum, but status is showing resolved but still, I didn't get my 4500 deposit money to my account. Many times I called customer care...

    • Many chemists are dacoits

      They sell 30% shelf life left medicines at full MRP and then oppose e pharmacies for selling at discounts. Consumer Affairs should take this up and right the act of these looting chemists.

      By Seema Somani
    • Instagra, Facebook, Whatsapp selling illegal services

      Can the Govt of India formulate some policy that regulates sales of services on ecommerce. Instagram, Facebook, Whatsapp are being used to sell prostitution services, drugs and weapons. Which polic...

      By Sudesh Rai
    • Not to take Daikin AC

      I purchased one 1.5 T daikin AC from one shop of Basudevpur, Bhadrak. But the AC is not cooling properly. After doing many request service engineer came two times. First time checked but condition ...

      By Paresh Dey
    • Why is MDR a percentage of transaction value

      Why cant MDR charge be capped at say INR 20. So make it 2% percent of transaction say till txn value 1000 and above that it should be capped at INR 20. That way if I buy 50,000 washing machine on ...

      By Ruchika Mistry
    • Restaurant Service Charge: Recent Experiences

      With this post we would like to seek your latest experiences in regards to restaurant service charge in the last few months.As a reference, Please find attached the Restaurant Service Charge aware...

      By Dept. of Consumer Affairs (Government of India)
    • Daikin refusing to replace damaged AC

      TL;DR I purchased a Daikin AC from amazon and I found it defective after a month. I contacted Daikin regarding this and they said there was no damage at first. Finally they offered me repair but I ...

      By Tarun Kumar Reddy
    • Solutions to improve Food Ordering eCommerce apps/sites

      Below are some of the key issues raised by you in regards to food related eCommerce sites and apps.Kindly review the same and help identify solutions that must be implemented to make these apps mor...

      By Dept. of Consumer Affairs (Government of India)
    • PVR and others convenience fee loot

      On one hand our respected PM is propogaing digital india on other hand these brands like PVR, book my show and many many others are charging convenience fee for doing transaction online. Some like...

      By Sudesh Rai
    • False information to get subscription from customer

      I received a call from Videocon d2h call centre regarding channel No 131 which is Comedy channel. The call centre person told that they are giving the channel @ Rs 1 for 7 days and if you like it, ...

      By Satya Pratap Detha
    • Misguided by Flipkart

      I ordered a product from and it was delivered on time when i opened it i realised that i had ordered pack of 6 and got only 5 pieces and these 5 pieces were just tied with the rubber b...

      By Vaibhav Kamath
Share To
Enter your email & mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

Please select a Circle that you want people to invite to.
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)