Should MINOR Projections & Extensions be regularized, without structural changes, imposing heavy penalty ? Please discuss.
In an over-populated city like Delhi, Land is the most expensive resource. Subsequently, unauthorized extensions and projections is a major issue for the State Government. Regularizing colonies (without imposing any penalty) is not a feasible solution to this problem.
For those booked properties (especially smaller plots) which have MINOR Projections (or Extensions, NOT on Municipal Land), should the State Government provide an option to regularize without any structural modifications, by allowing to pay a heavy penalty amount ? Houses constructed on smaller plots generally make full use of the plot area, mostly without any extension on the Municipal Land. This would add on to the State Government's revenue and also avoid any loss of Municipal Land.
And for those booked properties having significant/major projections or extensions, they should be obviously forced to make structural changes to get them regularized. more
For those booked properties (especially smaller plots) which have MINOR Projections (or Extensions, NOT on Municipal Land), should the State Government provide an option to regularize without any structural modifications, by allowing to pay a heavy penalty amount ? Houses constructed on smaller plots generally make full use of the plot area, mostly without any extension on the Municipal Land. This would add on to the State Government's revenue and also avoid any loss of Municipal Land.
And for those booked properties having significant/major projections or extensions, they should be obviously forced to make structural changes to get them regularized. more
Viewed by 30
View all 11 comments Below 11 comments
Please share more views on this complicated issue which impacts the lives of so many innocent residents of Delhi. more
Mar 30
IF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE AREA IS SUCH , YOUR POINT NO. 3 IS ADVISABLE IF THE HOUSE IS THE ONLY ONE HOUSE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER CONSTRUCTOR. NO RELAXATION SHALL BE ALLOWED TO THOSE WHO VENTURED A SECOND HOUSE PROPERTY IN THE COUNTRY SUCH IRREGULARLY AGAINST THE NORMS OF THE GOVERNMENTS PLEASE . more
Mar 23
In Delhi, since the State Government has such a huge mandate, an all party meet is never required for such small issues. In my opinion, below steps should be taken, 1. For smaller plots (less than 100 square meters), 100% coverage should be allowed without penalty. 2. Minor Projections should not be booked in the first place. There has to be a minimum criteria for booking. And to prevent Minor Projections, an alternate rule (imposing hefty penalty without structural changes) should be implemented. 3. For Major Projections and Extensions (whether Minor or Major), structural changes with penalty should be imposed. more
Mar 22
THE TECHNICAL AUTHORITIES OF MCD DEFINITELY HAVE THEIR RIGHT TO CONCEDE TO THE REQUEST FOR THE COVERAGE OF MINOR PROJECTIONS AND EVEN THE OTHER CASE , IF THE PARTICULAR LOCALITY IS SUCH THAT CAN BE ALLOWED. BUT , BASICALLY THE STATE GOVERNMENT SHALL TAKE THIS COMPLICATIVE DECISION STANDING STUBBORN IN CASES OF THOSE FIGHTING FOR CONSIDERING THEIR BIGGER PROJECTIONS OR EXTENSIONS. SO, AN ALL PARTY MEET AND COLLECTIVE DECISION WILL REDRESS THIS APPROPRIATELY. more
Mar 22
Please share your opinion on whether the state government should step in to resolve this issue which is impacting the lives of thousands of Delhites. more
Mar 22
