RTI: A bill that may kill a right

The retrograde amendment would amount to creating an RTI ministry under the government.

Fifteen years is a good time for appraisal of an institution. The Right to Information (RTI) Act, called the sunshine legislation and promulgated in 2005, certainly deserves an in-depth study and assessment for accelerating the flow of information to the public. This calls for upgrading skills, infrastructure, processes and alacrity of response from public authorities. A decadal review of the RTI regime undertaken in 2014 by the various stakeholders, resulted in very useful findings.

Presently, over 25,000 cases are filed with the Commission annually — a quantum jump from roughly 15,000, 10 years back. With digitisation, the entire process of filing applications, serving of notices, and uploading of decisions has become easier, and the system has ramped up capacities and efficiency. Increasing applications indicate the faith of the people as well as better response by public authorities.

It is in this context that the government’s plan to amend the RTI Act, to alter the salary and tenure of Information Commissioners, is intriguing. The Lok Sabha, on Monday, passed “The RTI Act (Amendment) Bill, 2018”. This was moved in the last session too, but withdrawn in the face of fierce opposition.

The penultimate bill on RTI in 2005 also had a provision of appointing deputy commissioners, who would function as per ‘the direction of the Central Government’. The Parliamentary Standing Committee recommended its deletion because it would make every Information Commissioner a clerk in the administration. Finally, when the bill was passed, this subclause was replaced with: “...may exercise all such powers and do all such acts and things which may be exercised or done by the Central Information Commission (CIC) autonomously without being subjected to directions by any other authority under this Act.” The Committee felt “it will be desirable to confer on the Information Commissioner and Deputy Information Commissioners, status of the Chief Election Commissioner and the Election Commissioner, respectively...”

The RTI (Amendment) Bill, 2019, is set to dilute the Act by downgrading Information Commissioners’ status, salary and autonomy. It will also impact the sovereignty of states since it curtails their powers to decide on the degree of independence for Information Commissioners in their own jurisdiction. If the bill is passed, there would be an anomalous situation where states would have the power to appoint commissioners, but the Centre will decide their tenure, salary and status.

Many states may object to such a move. Besides, how can both salary and tenure be specified from time to time? Does it mean different salary and tenures for different commissioners?

The government argues RTI is not a constitutional right, and CIC and State Information Commission are not constitutional bodies. But, the Supreme Court in catena of landmark cases, has held that RTI, like the right to vote, has emanated from right of expression under Article 19(1)(a). Both CEC and CIC enforce these two aspects of that fundamental right. The 2005 RTI Act says information is a ‘constitutional right’, while the 2019 bill contradicts it. If the Election Commission that enforces a right under Article 324 (1), is a constitutional institution, how can the Information Commission that enforces a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a), not be a constitutional body? The mandate of both is similar — to fulfil constitutional rights obligations. If RTI was introduced earlier in India, like some other countries, then, like the CEC, it would have found mention in the Constitution itself.

Both CIC and CEC are, therefore, equal and, like the judiciary, should be separate from the legislative and executive, according to the well established theory of separation of powers propounded by Montesquieu, and incorporated in Indian Constitution.

The preamble of the RTI Act of 2005 lays out its broad objectives — transparency and accountability. The Information Commissioners adjudicate appeals in a manner that these objectives are fulfilled, without any fear and favour. The commissioners, hence, need to be kept insulated from political vagaries and adorned with appropriate status. It may be mentioned here that detailed deliberations were held with all stakeholders including the judiciary, legislature and the executive before giving the present status to the commissioners, in the RTI Act 2004.

The RTI Act is a sunshine legislation. Astute handling of RTI queries directly impact governance, especially the public delivery system and expose corruption. More and more poor people seek recourse to justice through RTI. A ₹10 application gives them hope, and to the receiver, a public duty to discharge. The need of the hour is to strengthen the RTI regime by posting bold, upright and competent Commissioners who uphold the dignity and power of the institution. Reducing their status, salary and tenure would be a retrograde step amounting to creation of an RTI ministry under the government.

The bill, therefore, may kill the RTI Act itself. In the same vein as PM’s appeal to the public for sending suggestions for his August 15 address from the Red Fort, the proposed amendment of RTI should be thrown open to the public for wide-ranging discussions and suggestions before taking a decision.

Yashovardhan Azad and M Sridhar Acharyulu are former Central Information Commissioners (2013-2018)
The views expressed are personal more  

View all 9 comments Below 9 comments
I believe RTI Act was one of the best act introduced by the UPA Govt. where as amendment in the act by the NDA Govt. is its worst attempt. RTI Act had given power to the people to know the facts about the case/decision etc. It made bureaureaucrats to some extent accountable to their acts of commission and omission. more  
I agree with Mr. Yashovardhan Azadji. more  
It was an effective tool to have right information from Govt. on various issues. No doubt, sometimes one has to do a lot of excercise to furnish the requisite information as I experienced, during my service. Failed to understnad why it is restricted instead of expanding the opportunity. Present Govt. is talking on transparency. It could easily remove doubt among people. Of course, one hugely mandated Govt. would like to administer what Govt. wishes, as opposition stands on a weak pole. more  
It is beyond comprehension, as to how come, reducing salary and fixing tenure can alter the impartiality of an Information Commissioner. This tantamount to saying that any organisation within government ambit is prone to become corrupt and rotten. Sir, in India none of us actually knew about the powers of Election Commission and Chief Election Commission till the onset of Sh. T.N. Sheshan. In pre-Sheshan era EC was considered to toe the line of the ruling party. But subsequent Election Commissioners have made a mark in protecting the democracy in India. The logic that the amendment bill to RTI Act will lead to killing of RTI Act sound quite weird actually. An upright, responsible and knowledgeable Information Commissioner has all the powers to ensure the relevance of RTI Act. None of it is being taken by anybody. In any case the ruling of IC/CIC can be challenged in High Court, so there was no reason to see that the status of an IC is held equivalent to a Supreme Court Judge. Government of the day is just correcting this mistake. more  
Wow! What a joke! Why don't you suggest to the Government to give the rank of Section Officers to the Information Comissioner! more  
Absolutely on the dot. What a weird situation that a person whose role is essentially to facilitate information flow should enjoy salary and status equivalent to a SC judge. Govt. is correcting this anomaly. The entire post is a crib about salaries being reduced. Shameful. In the name of public service, IC want to enjoy fat salaries, remain above scrutiny and a law on to themselves. more  
Leaving aside my political affiliations and thinking good only of the nation, I agree with Mr Yashovardhan Azad sir. more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • Garbage Burning right now

      See attached everyone please. The circle manager has rightly identified garbage burning as a cause in the polls being conducted. Look in attached video from 2 hours back how garbage ia b...

      By Mala Sehgal
    • Foot Over bridge non functional at start of DND

      There used to be a FoB installed at start of DND on Delhi-Noida side. The FoB worked for hardly 2 years. It got damaged probably because it was of poor quality and since then we encounter huge jams...

      By Jaspreet Oberoi

      Just as we use this platform LocalCircles to voice our concerns, we should also express our gratitude when the issue is resolved. Recently i had highlighted that the ramp area foot bridge near...

      By Gurmeet Singh
    • The Odd-Even joke

      The odd even joke will be again played on us Nov 4th to Nov 15th. Govt is saying fine of 4000 but women drivers, two wheelers and those with disability, cng will be all exempt. What is ...

      By Anil Mehta
    • How to cope with pollution

      1. Make use of activated charcoal We have heard of activated charcoal being used in face wash and toothpaste. But, not many people know that they also act as a great air purifier. Activa...

      By Shivani Batra
    • DG Set ban impractical

      Would the administrators of Noida Delhi, Gurgaon and other NCR cities advise what is their plan to implement DG set ban. Like some people mentioned, they have elderly people at home dependent on me...

      By Radha Puri
    • DG set ban after oct 15 wont be implemented

      As much as I appreciate Bhure Lal of EPCA to be a fighter against pollution, I thinks he lacks understanding of how generators work. By giving clarifications below he is only confusing everyone mor...

      By Sudesh Rai
    • Pollution in Delhi now 5 fold in 2 weeks

      See attached everyone. GRAP needs to kick in immediately. What steps are being taken. Tomorrow will be worse than today. Why arent Delhi Govt and MCDs putting a construction ban?

      By Vinita Agrawal
    • Pollution is here - do what now CM

      The cm of delhi has been shamelessly advertising how he has reducec pollution in delhi through full page ads. Here see attached the pollution is back CM. Can we please stop this ad nonse...

      By Anshu Saxena
    • Why fine people always

      Why the govts see higher penalties n fines on people as a solution to every civic problem. Why not fine the engineers n contractors for potholes! Why not fine officials for delays ...

      By S S Sharma
    • Odd Even Exemption Feedback.

      Odd Even is being planned for Nov 4th to Nov 15th in Delhi to fight pollution. Can we please discuss the list of exemptions and perhaps LC should escalate the same to Delhi Chief Minister. <...

      By Seema Mehra
Share To
Enter your email & mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

Please select a Circle that you want people to invite to.
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)