Is this profiteering

Himalaya anti wrinkle cream earlier had price of 250 MRP and i thought gst rate on cosmetics was changed by finance ministry to 18%

Should the mrp have reduced from 250.

The first product is 2016 make (pre gst) and the online listing is may 2019. On flipkart the price is 350 for same product.

Please advise more  

F9969BDB-51BB-461F-9956-646300D32EA3___20190526082828___.jpeg
B3D715FF-3307-496A-8953-8FB85D9ED2D7___20190526082822___.jpeg
8E77B593-431A-486D-846D-33EF9CD47CCF___20190526082809___.jpeg
+2
View all 10 comments Below 10 comments
Thanks all. Sharing more examples more  
Friends, please do not beat about the bush. Let us understand the inquisition. I try to explain what questioner, Niharika Jain wants to understand:
1) Product produced was of 2016, and the MRP was Rs.250.
2) The MRP of the same product in 2019 is quoted as Rs.350, as per the list price.
3) The consumer says that the gst rate was changed (the date of which is not mentioned) to 18%, say, the gst rate was reduced in the year 2018.
4) The answer of the manufacturer is that between the year 2016 (the date of manufacture) and 2019 (the current rate of production) with a time gap of three years, the production and marketing costs have since increased.
5) The consumer argues that the manufacturer has since increased the MRP absorbing rising cost in the three years and government giving the benefit (additional) of reduced gst. Therefore, the benefit of reduced gst should have been passed on to the consumer, which has not been done.
(Here, I would like the questioner, Niharika Jain, to produce copies of the two Tax Invoice - of 2016 and 2019. It will also be appropriate for the Tax Authorities of the State/Centre to obtain copies of the Input Costs of the years 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 to determine the actual value of the MRP - for academic purposes)
6) So, on the one hand through the proportionate add up of the rising Input Cost the manufacturer has made up the production and marketing costs in the MRP, but has not given the benefit of reduced gst to the consumer. Therefore, it is a clear case of unfair business practice and should be refunded the overcharged gst to the consumer. It is a case of Unfair BUsiness Practice, not of Anti-profiteering. National Anti-profiteering Authority has no claim on the overcharged gst.
7) This confusion is also because the Government of India in the Department of Revenue/Taxation has never laid down the format of a Tax Invoice meant to be given to the buyer. more  
Let this fraud be exposed in Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp etc to go viral so that public start questioning and demanding fair and legally valid price. more  
Matter should be referred to National anti profiteering agency more  
yes, it is profiteering and should be reported. more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • GST increase on mobile phones

      GST rates are being increased from 12 to 18% on mobile phones. We should assess how long portals take to charge increased GST versus how long they take to reduce GST rates. Th...

      By Arjun Singh
      /
    • Sanitizer and Mask profiteering

      I have reasons to believe that some manufacturers are increasing MRPs of sanitizers and masks. I suggest national Profiteetring authority and legal metrology to look at old MRP and new M...

      By Garima Sharma
      /
    • Pathetic Johnson & Johnson

      Seems like Delhi High Court has put a stay on the anti profiteering order against J&J for profiteering on sanitary napkins, Instead of paying the 42.8 crores GST it has gotten the stay from Del...

      By Garima Sharma
      /
    • Shared this from Anti-Profiteering

      Proud to share that this complaint of mine may have been processed by anti profiteering body. They have booked loreal for 186 crores of profiteering. long live consumer movement of india. be vigila...

      By Anil Mehta
      /
    • GST rate rejig

      I have been told by my industry association friends that Finance Minister listens to localcircles and takes interest in collective asks of this platform. I am not sure if this poll is be...

      By Sridhar Mohan
      /
    • Govt to reward receipt taking and reporting

      I am so glad that the Government is so actively taking up complaints posting in this circle. Yesterday they fined Nestle 73 crores for profiteering, I believe was reported in this circle and they h...

      By Garima Sharma
      /
    • GST

      already we are blocking the working capital by paying the advance GST for all imports, to get back from the market it takes minimum of 5 to 6 months. If further increase all small scale industries ...

      By Anonymous Circle member
      /
    • GST Rate Increase

      Reading in the news that the Government is considering increasing gst rate from 5% to 6% for items in this bracket? Issues - Since the difference is small, will be very difficult to catch profiteer...

      By Ajay Dutta
      /
    • Saving due to GST 320 per month

      Finance Ministry’s attached calculation is showing that due GST every household on average is saving 320 per month. Can everyone please review and share their feedback. Is it more ...

      By Sridhar Mohan
      /
    • J and J profiteering of 2.3 Billion caught with circle efforts

      The National Anti-profiteering Authority is investigating Johnson & Johnson Pvt Ltd for not passing on the reduction in goods and services tax on a range of its products to customers, a governm...

      By Garima Sharma
      /
    • Why are NAA profiteering orders getting stayed

      Why NAA is not being diligent on how hearings are done and orders are passed. 3 people do the hearing, 4 people sign the order. The Mumbai High Court uses that as basis and stays the NAA order. Sho...

      By Sridhar Mohan
      /
Share
Enter your email & mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

Please select a Circle that you want people to invite to.
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)