No doubt this will be a great dicision, but one of the main priority for the Govt. is to also think how they will reduce the income gap between the rich and the poor and than only they will be able give the justice to the poor. In india only 1% of people may keep 99% of the wealth while 99% of the people may have only 1% of the total wealth. A great inequality. more
Target to reduce manpower in Income Tax Department to 100 by simple rules and forcing everybody to have PAN. This can also be UID. Remove all bungling jargon like HUF, Company and AOP etc. more
It would be a strategic move to enhance the income limit for taxation to 5 lakh, which will also reduce the time spent by the IT department and the employers in calculating tax burden, recovery and remittance. Reducing the gap between the rich and poor has nothing to do with raising the tax limit and needs a different strategy and determination. C Kameswara Rao more
Kishore, I don't know why you and lot of people keep talking about reducing the income gap between the rich and the poor. I have a question for you...have you ever thought of removing the inequality between the best student and the worst student by giving everyone the same marks? Well, here is a story for you. Sometime back I had read a story about a Professor of Economics in college telling his students that he would grade the tests in a socialist manner...meaning everyone would get the same grade based on the average in the class. After the first test the average was C. Those students who had not studied were very happy to get a C, when they should have failed, however those students who worked hard were disappointed to get a C, when some of them would have deserved an A. When the time came for the second test, those students who had worked hard took it easy and the rest took it even more casually. The average of the second test was a D. Finally, when the final exam came, no body studied as a result, the average was F (fail). The whole class failed. This is what happens when you try to remove the inequality. The only way you can ensure the gap is eliminated is in a Socialist government. However, we know that socialism will never work, it destroys societies that you are trying to enhance. In the above example, our goal should have been to improve the grades of the students who are not doing well and hopefully improve their conditions. It is also possible some of them don't have the aptitude for that subject and perhaps they should try different course. In such cases, we should have a system in place to offer vocational guidance, etc. In every situation I have seen so far, when Govt decides to reduce the gap, the rich become poorer but the poor become more poor and either the society dies or the gap keeps widening and the result is many people who were above the poverty line go below it. The idea should be to increase everyone's wealth. Environment should be conducive to increase wealth. There will always be the gap. At the same time, I have stated in one of my posts that income tax should be replaced by consumption tax and consumption should be taxed at the same flat (no slabs) rate. This way if the rich who have lot of money will spend more and thereby contribute more the the exchequer. The Govt may decide to have no consumption tax on basic necessities like food, clothing, and shoes (all up to a certain amount) that way the poor will not have to pay any taxes and the rich who consume a lot will contribute a lot. Hope this helps. Thanks Nirmal more
The real issues faced by the country since a long time: 1. No growth in Per capita income but only growth in GDP 2. Huge income disparities among the Citizens, no efforts to minimise the ...
I have no intension to Interfere in any ED procedure, neither am I any patent supporter of any Political group which I have repeatedly written in various online and offline portals. I ha...
Taking on the Topic of freezing any bank account on the con-text of vote: Vote to me is like any other game, where some opposite minded political groups contest against each other, ...
Headline in Economic Times 19th February 2024 “Niti Ayog Calls for Tax, Legal Reforms for Elderly”. What is surprising is that PM is Chairman of Niti Ayog but is probably not infor...
This bill was passed by Loksabha and Rajyasabha recently. Many political parties are not happy as the implementing process may take around two years. What surprises me is that, why these poli...
Women Quota Bill: The Long awaited women Quota Bill will be Tabled on September 20TH 2023. We women are no less, but we are still are very less in number in every Profession i...
Even though PM has been advocating SABKA SATH SABKA VIKAS SABKA VISHWAS, the reality is something else which he may not be even aware of. The Bureaucrats who are running the government have impleme...
As per news Government is considering changing Organ Donation Rules. I would like Govt. to consider the following suggestion: When a person meets with an accident and subsequently dies i...
Kill Senior Citizens ๐๐๐๐๐๐ Govt should kill all sr. citizens after the age of 65 because Govt is not ready to pay attention to these nation builders.This issue was raised in Parliament by Ho...
PM held roadshows and rallies in Karnataka requesting voters to vote for BJP. Unfortunately BJP lost. In my humble opinion the reasons for BJP losing are listed below: 1. Perhaps PM is not awa...
1. After reading in the news that several young voters of Karnataka tried to sell their votes to the highest bidder, I think we should have a serious look at our model of democracy. When people can...
By Govind Vijayaraghavan
/
Share
Sign Petition
Enter your email and mobile number and we will send you the instructions