How Dangerous is Micro-plastic?

Friends,
since last few days many members have expressed their concern over plastic waste and banning plastic bags.
Technical University of Munich , has recently published a detailed study report, which is showing the other side of the coin as hazard to the environment.Hope, all members may be interested to read and offer their views, comments for our awareness and concern .How far our knowledge and preparedness is there to combat such threats.

microplasticPlastic particles on a beach at Mallorca (Spain)CREDIT: ANDREAS BATTENBERG / TUM

After early reports of microplastic pollution in our oceans and beaches sounded the alarm, the global scientific community intensified its focus into this area. Researchers have since found evidence of microplastic contamination seemingly everywhere—also in our lakes and rivers, beverages and food supplies. Dr. Natalia Ivleva, a researcher with the Technical University of Munich (TUM), has developed new analytical methods for the identification and quantification of microplastic. In this interview, she shares her latest findings.

What exactly is microplastic?

According to current definitions, microplastic is any piece of plastic measuring five millimeters in size down to one micrometer, that is one-thousandth of a millimeter. Plastic particles that are smaller—from one micrometer down to 100 nanometers—are defined as sub-microplastic. Particles below 100 nm are called nanoplastic. Studies show, that most of the plastic particles possess sizes in lower micrometer range.

Both microplastics and nanoplastics are usually formed by the breakdown of larger pieces of plastic—for example, from shopping bags to the wear and tear on a car's tires or when we wash an article of microfiber clothing. And since some manufacturers are still adding microplastics to personal care products like toothpaste and scrubs—they are a source of microplastic pollution, too.

Why do we need to be worried about microplastic pollution?

Actually, it's not yet totally clear just how dangerous microplastics are for living organisms. What is known: aquatic organisms and other species, including humans, can absorb microplastic particles. But that alone doesn't prove toxicity. However, we have also ascertained that smaller-sized particles might have the ability to be absorbed in certain types of body tissue in aquatic organisms.

Each year, humans produce around 400 million tons of plastic worldwide. A significant proportion of this plastic ends up in the environment as litter, and most types of plastic take several hundred years to completely degrade.

The result? Over the next few decades, we will probably be facing a massive increase in the amount of microplastic pollution in the environment. We all know that even inert and non-toxic substances can have unforeseen effects once they reach a certain level of concentration in the environment.

Why don't we know more about the effects of microplastic pollution?

Early on, when researchers first realized that microplastic was entering the environment as a result of human activity, optical methods were used to distinguish plastic from other particles in a given sample. Unfortunately, this method is not very reliable. When you are looking at a particle that is smaller than a millimeter in size, it's difficult to discern whether it is a grain of sand or a piece of plastic. They look very similar at that size.

One good example of this: under the auspices of the research project "MiWa," funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), we did a chemical analysis of around 3,000 particles from a water sample taken from the Elbe River. We ascertained that only one in a thousand particles in the sample was actually plastic.

Alongside limestone and other mineral particles, the water sample also contained a lot of organic material. That is why it's of the utmost importance to develop reliable and standardized analysis methods—otherwise, there is no way to accurately compare different sample values with one another.

I want to emphasize here that we're talking about extremely low concentrations of microplastics in the samples we have analyzed—which we would expect would have a correspondingly small effect on the health of a living organism. In some experiments testing for high concentrations of microplastic, negative effects have been measured—while in others, no negative effects have been found.

This research is still very much in its infancy—which doesn't mean that we should take a 'wait and see' approach.. If we consider the slow rate at which plastic degrades, it is an urgent priority for us to find strategies for reducing the amount of plastic waste we're producing in the first place.

What methods are being used to detect and identify microplastic particles?

Depending on what questions you're asking, there are several different methods currently being employed to analyze samples for microplastic. For example, thermal analysis paired with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry is employed to determine the quantity and types of plastic particles and additives that might be present. But these methods cannot be used to determine particle sizes.

Spectroscopic methods can be used to determine both the chemical fingerprint as well as the size and shape of microplastic particles. And infrared micro-spectroscopy can even be used to automatically analyze particles down to the size of 20 micrometers.

At the TUM Institute of Hydrochemistry, we predominantly employ Raman microscopic analysis in our research. Raman is a non-destructive spectroscopic method that makes it possible to conduct both a signature spectrum analysis as well as facilitate reliable particle identification. Using this method, we can determine whether a particle is made of synthetic polymers—or if it's a natural substance such as cellulose or quartz.

Additionally, this method allows us to precisely determine the type of plastic in a sample. And coupling the power of a Raman spectrometer with a regular optical microscope, we can analyze particles down to one micrometer or even smaller. The result: we have the ability to clearly define the number of particles, the range of particle sizes and the polymer types of the microplastics in any given sample.

We have been able to confirm the presence of microplastic particles in the digestive tracts of water fleas. Furthermore, in a project funded by the Bavarian State Ministry of Environment and Consumer Protection, we have found that mussels ingest especially small microplastic particles—deposits of which we have found throughout their bodies.

What are the next steps in your research?

To develop representative and statistically reliable conclusions about the level of microplastic contamination in any given sample, we will need to analyze a lot of particles per sample. That is why we are also currently working on the automation of Raman-based methods in the project "MiPAq," which is being funded by the Bavarian Research Foundation (BFS).

As plastic particles degrade to ever-smaller sizes in the environment, they present an increasingly higher potential for environmental toxicity. That is why our institute is collaborating with other TUM chairs to develop more accurate methods for analyzing very small particles within the BMBF-funded "SubμTrack" project.

First, we'll need to collect enough comparable sample results—using standardized analysis methods—which will show us just how much microplastic or nanoplastic is actually present in any given sample. Only then we can begin to analyze the negative effects that might be caused by a certain level of microplastic or nanoplastic contamination in the environment—or in humans and other species. It will also be necessary for researchers to determine which types, particle sizes and shapes—and especially which concentrations of microplastics and nanoplastics—have which toxic effects.

Would you recommend that we ban all plastic production in the future?

Absolutely not—plastic is an incredibly versatile material and has a lot of advantages over other materials. That said—it is of paramount importance for us to drastically reduce the amount of plastic we are introducing into the environment. And it's not just the companies manufacturing plastic that need to shoulder the sole responsibility and burden for this—it is also up to us as consumers to become more responsible in how we use, reuse, recycle and dispose of plastic in the future. more  

View all 16 comments Below 16 comments
Yes is going to be great challenge for us. more  
Sir, Can I mail this article of yours to be printed in our monthly journal "Mysore Commerce"? If so, mail your consent to ksmurli1960@gmail.com. You can view the journals in our website fkcci.org more  
YES I agree it is a big danger to environment more  
Why this mail was send to me ? On 2019-01-14 14:48, Kaushikk D. Vyas wrote: > more  
Very interesting and an eye opener. Major problem is caused by the single use plastic bags and need to be totally banned. more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • Large Housing Projects: Environmental Regulation

      Governments at Centre, States and Local Civic Bodies in large cities should consider incorporating the following conditions while granting building approval of large housing complexes and townships...

      By MOHIT PANDE
      /
    • Scrapping of Vehicle

      I purchased Maruti Baleno 15 years ago. It ran only 78000 KM and was in excellant condition. After completion of 15 years I had to dispose it off. I am now a senior citizen. Do not have enough mone...

      By Rajesh Kumar Jain
      /
    • Managing Natural Resources for the Benefit of the Indian Citizens

      Managing Natural Available Resources to fulfill the needs of Indian Citizens Good Evening!!!! I am hereby outlining the concept to manage the available natural resources or the resources ...

      By Dr. Amit Nerkar
      /
    • Air pollution

      Pollution of cities must be tackled by the government on war footing. It’s so bad that on weather app by The Weather Channel it shows the air in Mumbai and at least 15-20 Indian cities as &ld...

      By Parag Rane
      /
    • Making Fighting Pollution a priority

      Please watch the attached and share the same with your whatsapp friends. Some days back inputs were being sought in circles on what is needed from the next Government. Clearly...

      By Seema Mehra
      /
    • Most polluted place on earth - India

      This is how the world projects us. Read attached or at the link below. https://ig.ft.com/india-pollution/ Our...

      By Vinita Agrawal
      /
    • Air Quality Life Index Report

      Air Quality Life Index Report is attached and issued by University of Chicago. Says air pollution cuts life by 4.3 years on average in India. In Delhi by 10 years. In Noida and Ghaziabad by 10.7 y...

      By Vinita Agrawal
      /
    • Hindu religious places - high pollution of water bodies!

      It is a pity that we find that majority of Hindu religious places where perennial rivers like Ganga ,Yamuna, Godavari , Krishna , Tungabhadra flow but the banks are polluted to the hilt by plastic...

      By Prabhakarrao Yerragunta
      /
    • Reducing Plastic Waste

      What Can I Do to Reduce the Amount of Plastic Waste I Generate? Reducing the amount of plastic waste you generate doesn't have to be difficult. In fact, you can do any or all of the following...

      By MOHIT PANDE
      /
    • The newly elected MCD will have to do a lot of work to clean up Delhi and save the city and Delhites from Garbage dumps, mosquitos and such diseases.. httptoi.in/wwRsWZ/a18fg ...

      By Padmaja Krishnan
      /
Share
Enter your email and mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

All My Circles
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)