GST law and property - some myths and reality

Myth: GST has an equal impact on all residential properties

The impact of GST on a property is dependent on various factors like the classification of the project into affordable and non-affordable housing, the phase of construction, type of project (Residential Real Estate Project or Real Estate Project) as well as location.

To illustrate, the GST law ignores one of the important factors in real-estate sector which governs its price i.e. location. It assumes a similar land cost in all the projects at 1/3rd of total value irrespective of its location. Thus, if a person buys a house in Delhi and another person buys a house in a village in Uttar Pradesh, all will have to pay applicable GST considering 1/3rd as value of land. This is a travesty. Further, due the reduced tax rate in affordable housing, there will be larger impact on this segment as compared to luxury housing.

Myth: GST law in real estate is clear

There persist certain grey areas which need a thorough evaluation :

Taxability of land value where the same exceeds one-third of the total sale price and the developer has contracted separate agreements for the supply of land and the construction portion;
Ineligibility of refund to developers under the inverted duty structure considering inputs are procured at a higher rate of tax, whereas the output is charged at a lower tax rate.
Adopting different tax computation methods for different projects/phases of the same project.
Contradictory provisions for ITC availment i.e. one of the key conditions for reduced rate of GST is non-availment of ITC. However, in case of area sharing model, GST law specified that landowner can avail the ITC on the construction services provided by the developer. But, it didn’t specify about the utilization. Thus, the recent clarification by way of notification was issued with respect to the same.
Tracking of purchases from registered and non-registered persons and to report the discrepancies in form on GST portal. However, there is no clarity on the form which needs to be filled.
The above points show GST laws in the real-estate sector aren't clear and there are still many grey areas that need to be looked at and clarified.

Myth: No GST is applicable on the sale of plots

GST law excludes sale of plots from GST levies. Further, sale of the building is also exempt where the entire consideration is received after issuance of completion certificate or after its first occupation.

However, if there is a plot on which small constructions like two rooms or a single room are built, then it will fall under the purview of GST and GST will be leviable if the said plot is transferred before construction.

And, as per GST law, 1/3rd value of plots will be excluded and GST will be leviable on the 2/3rd value which is actually tantamount to GST on land value since the value of construction will be very less. Further, as stated earlier, in places where the land cost is higher than the construction cost, this valuation of 1/3rd doesn’t hold good and GST is being paid on land value leading to dual taxation which defeats the very purpose of introduction of GST.

Myth: Developers do not want to pass on the benefit to buyers

There is a perception that developers do not want to pass the benefit to end users. This does not bear scrutiny. They do want to pass on the benefit as this would not only attract more buyers but also build trust for their brand. However, the lack of mechanism to compute the benefits is a big impediment.

The industry is grappling with the need to determine the actual benefit from GST so that they can pass it on to the consumers. Unlike other sectors like FMCG, in the case of real estate, the product is unique. It is difficult for a developer to apportion the benefits of input tax credit across various projects due to changing market conditions impacting the estimated prices frequently.

The major challenge is passing on input tax credit to under-construction projects, where part of the project has been completed before GST. Although, there have been various rulings from National Anti-Profiteering Authority specifying the methodology to compute these benefits, they do not address all the issues.

Myth: The affordable housing project is always affordable.

Following are the key qualifying criteria for a residential property to be classified as a project under the affordable housing segment in India:

The total carpet area of the residential property cannot exceed 60 square meters in metropolitan areas.
The total carpet area of residential property cannot exceed 90 square meters in non-metropolitan cities and towns.
The total value of a property cannot exceed Rs 45 lakh in either metropolitan or non-metropolitan areas.
Therefore, affordable housing projects are not always affordable. They come with a lot of terms and conditions to fall under the definition and requirements of affordable housing and the definition of affordability varies from person to person.

Myth: No GST is applicable on electricity and water charges for maintenance of property

Flat owners are liable to pay 18% GST on a residential property if they pay at least Rs 7,500 as maintenance charge to their housing society. Housing societies or residents’ welfare associations (RWAs) that collect Rs 7,500 per month per flat, also have to pay 18% tax on the entire amount. Housing societies that have an annual turnover up to the specified limit under GST are, however, exempted from paying the GST. Thus, for the GST to be applicable, both the conditions should apply – i.e., each member should pay more than Rs 7,500 per month as maintenance charge and the annual turnover of the RWA should be higher than the specified limit.

It has been clarified by the government that the entire amount will be taxable if the maintenance charges exceed Rs 7,500 per month per member. For example, if the maintenance charges are Rs 9,000 per month per member, then 18% GST will be payable on the entire amount of Rs 9000 and not on Rs 1500 (Rs 9,000-Rs 7,500). Also, owners with multiple flats in the same housing society will be taxed for each unit separately.

GST will be applicable on the electricity and water charges paid for the maintenance of a property @18% (9% CGST + 9% SGST).

To summarise then, there is a need to rationalise the compliance related procedures and further simplification and clarifications are needed to reach to the ultimate objective of the introduction of GST as a good and a simple tax. more  

helpful....real estate sector has a real pain in the form of market value for stamp duty.....GST is add on On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:18:22 +0530 Garima Sharma wrote > more  
GST Law has been made very complicated by Bureaucrats who have no business experience. There are many contradictory Rulings given by Advance Ruling Authority in various States. To give an example High Court has ruled that the 18% GST on members contribution in a Coop. Hsg. Society is applicable on balance amount after deducting Rs.7500. Another contradiction is if a Society's annual turnover is less than 20 Lakhs then no GST is applicable even if members contribution is more than 7500. There is no GST applicable to Rich persons like Ambani who may be spending much more than 7500 on maintenance of their multi story high rise in South Mumbai. GST on Cement is 28% as it is a Luxury and Sin good. This ensures that builders will use minimum quantity of Cement to construct Road Bridges and buildings to save on construction cost. Many provisions of GST law including GST on Coop. Hsg. Societies are unconstitutional. more  
Good info circulated. There is need to curtail gst on many services. Service tax is a major contributor to Govt. kitty. Even a scooter loan repayment attracts service tax. more  
I have a query. What about affordable housing? Does GST apply on the CAM charges? Our monthly charges are only 1500 and for affordable it is five years maintenance free. Also can the builder claim GST for past two years, he claims he did not charge the residents and wants to claim it now. Is this possible? more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • HUL Profiteering

      In 2018-19 this circle had escalated complaint on HUL profiteering and a 400 crore case was made against them by anti-profiteering authority. HUL is again raising MRP by 3-14% and reduci...

      By Garima Sharma
    • Income Tax NEW PORTAL

      I fully agree with Mr Vishal Khanna. All the high end IT companies charge a fortune and our Govt. continues to promote such companies at the cost of the Tax Payers. This could ha...

      By Anantharaman Subramanian
    • Infosys Loot of tax payer money

      Infosys was awarded the Rs 4,242-crore contract in 2019 to develop the new portal. Read this again guys 4000+ crore to develop the portal. This is after the c grade performance of infos...

      By Vishal Khanna
    • Profiteering by Airtel DTH

      I am an Airtel prepaid DTH subscriber. Once the deposit becomes zero they disconnect the telecast. Now as I am out of home due to pandamic I told them to stop the telecast to save the ...

    • Covid GST rate reduction

      Attached items will have gst rate reduction. That means these existing products would have to be sold at lower MRPs and hence if anyone sells the product to you at old mrp pre June 12, you post the...

      By Garima Sharma
    • Flawed Vaccine Policies - Punjab makes it a business

      The state govt of Punjab seems to have created a trade out of vaccines. It got covaxin at INR 400 and sold to 20 private hospitals for INR 1060. People pf Punjab probably paid 1500-2000 ...

      By Amod Agarwal
    • Remdesivir ₹15000 per injection - Hyderabad

      My uncle's wife is in a hospital in Hyderabad. Her oxygen level was 70 four days back, now it is 87. The doctors are insisting that my uncle should get remdevisir. The doctors have been telling him...

      By Padmanabhan G

      The resource post “Vaccine Profiteering being done” has only opened a Pandoras Box to get readers aware on the Pricing. Adar Poonawalla had come as an “AABATH BHANDHAVAN&rdq...

      By Jayakumar Daniel
    • Vaccine Profiteering being done

      "Hi, my name is Adar and I make vaccines. This one costs ₹150, which includes a profit margin. But I'd like to sell it for ₹400 because I deserve "super profits". Wait, you're all angry? Ok, I'll r...

      By Anil Mehta
    • Profiteering from Pandemic

      These two vaccine makers Serum and Bharat Biotech will soon be charging Indians the highest price citizens of any country are paying for their vaccine. It is shameful and the worst act of profiteer...

      By Garima Sharma
Enter your email and mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

All My Circles
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)