Good explanation of profiteering...

Since the goods and services tax (GST) was introduced in India, the GST Council has reduced tax rates on many items over time to make sure the household costs of consumers come down. In different discussions on LocalCircles, which hosts an anti-profiteering online community for National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA), several consumers have been reporting that even after the GST rate reduction, many manufacturers as well as retailers have not been passing on the benefits. For instance, though GST rates on regular household items like shampoos, cosmetics, groceries, etc. were reduced from 28% to 18% in November 2017, only 27% consumers confirmed in the January 2019 LocalCircles survey that they have actually seen maximum retail prices (MRPs) being revised downwards. Similarly, for items like appliances, fragrances, paints, etc., where GST rates were reduced in July 2018, only 26% consumers have confirmed experiencing lower MRPs while 38% confirmed that MRPs had not been reduced, 36% didn’t know or did not have a need to buy such items.
Now, consumers can easily submit a complaint with evidence of old and new MRPs to outline instances of profiteering. It can be an invoice, a screenshot of product listing with MRP from an e-commerce site or a picture of the actual product. In cases of restaurants, one can submit invoices or even pictures of the old and new menu cards, which many times have a date on them. Once the complaint is received via the anti-profiteering online community or the NAA complaint form, it is forwarded to the Standing Committee within 24 hours and is taken for evaluation. The entire process of evaluation, investigation, hearing and order currently takes anywhere between 9-12 months from the time a complaint is registered.
Based on complaints received, it is apparent that majority of the brands have not tended to revise MRPs on existing stocks at their warehouse and at the distributor or retailer level so till these stocks are depleted, the consumers don’t actually experience the benefit. Same is the case with e-commerce, where in many cases, the sellers are still listing products with the old and higher MRPs. When a consumer submits a complaint, not only is that particular SKU (stock keeping unit) questioned but many times the entire product category is evaluated for profiteering.

What is required here is that the manufacturers or the brands take a proactive approach to passing on GST benefits and a supply chain communication mechanism is implemented which is electronic and fast, so different players in the chain know the price revision by SKU and understand that these benefits are to be passed now, rather than when they get the new stock with updated MRPs. In some cases, the brands may even have to issue credit vouchers to retailers to compensate them for selling the stock at a lower price than the MRP.
The math of profiteering is rather simple, where once a GST rate is reduced, the base price for an item is calculated from the old MRP and the new GST rate is applied to the base price to derive the expected MRP. The difference between the brand’s new MRP and the expected MRP is what classifies as profiteering. more  

View all 16 comments Below 16 comments
Could not find a proper forum. Also since you claim to be in consumer protection this topic should interest you more  
Most of the time business man reluctant to reduce the price. Who want to cut their profit. more  
Law implementation wing must look in to the matter and act accordingly. more  
This article is not written by Sanjana but Founder of LocalCircles. more  
Tnq for the post. more  
Post a Comment

Related Posts

    • GST increase on mobile phones

      GST rates are being increased from 12 to 18% on mobile phones. We should assess how long portals take to charge increased GST versus how long they take to reduce GST rates. Th...

      By Arjun Singh
    • Sanitizer and Mask profiteering

      I have reasons to believe that some manufacturers are increasing MRPs of sanitizers and masks. I suggest national Profiteetring authority and legal metrology to look at old MRP and new M...

      By Garima Sharma
    • Pathetic Johnson & Johnson

      Seems like Delhi High Court has put a stay on the anti profiteering order against J&J for profiteering on sanitary napkins, Instead of paying the 42.8 crores GST it has gotten the stay from Del...

      By Garima Sharma
    • Shared this from Anti-Profiteering

      Proud to share that this complaint of mine may have been processed by anti profiteering body. They have booked loreal for 186 crores of profiteering. long live consumer movement of india. be vigila...

      By Anil Mehta
    • GST rate rejig

      I have been told by my industry association friends that Finance Minister listens to localcircles and takes interest in collective asks of this platform. I am not sure if this poll is be...

      By Sridhar Mohan
    • Govt to reward receipt taking and reporting

      I am so glad that the Government is so actively taking up complaints posting in this circle. Yesterday they fined Nestle 73 crores for profiteering, I believe was reported in this circle and they h...

      By Garima Sharma
    • GST

      already we are blocking the working capital by paying the advance GST for all imports, to get back from the market it takes minimum of 5 to 6 months. If further increase all small scale industries ...

      By Anonymous Circle member
    • GST Rate Increase

      Reading in the news that the Government is considering increasing gst rate from 5% to 6% for items in this bracket? Issues - Since the difference is small, will be very difficult to catch profiteer...

      By Ajay Dutta
    • Saving due to GST 320 per month

      Finance Ministry’s attached calculation is showing that due GST every household on average is saving 320 per month. Can everyone please review and share their feedback. Is it more ...

      By Sridhar Mohan
    • J and J profiteering of 2.3 Billion caught with circle efforts

      The National Anti-profiteering Authority is investigating Johnson & Johnson Pvt Ltd for not passing on the reduction in goods and services tax on a range of its products to customers, a governm...

      By Garima Sharma
    • Why are NAA profiteering orders getting stayed

      Why NAA is not being diligent on how hearings are done and orders are passed. 3 people do the hearing, 4 people sign the order. The Mumbai High Court uses that as basis and stays the NAA order. Sho...

      By Sridhar Mohan
Enter your email & mobile number and we will send you the instructions

Note - The email can sometime gets delivered to the spam folder, so the instruction will be send to your mobile as well

Please select a Circle that you want people to invite to.
Invite to
(Maximum 500 email ids allowed.)